On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/
Martin
On 29/06/2021 11:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/
Martin
In the HTML version of t
On 28/06/2021 21:06, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> I wrote an article for the Red Hat Developer blog about how
> to annotate code to get the most out of GCC's access checking
> warnings like -Warray-bounds, -Wformat-overflow, and
> -Wstringop-overflow. The article published last week:
>
> https:/
Hello,
I'm trying to generate unique identifiers for some trees at link time.
I understand that there are already some unique identifiers in
declarations (DECL_UID) and perhaps others. Do all trees have unique
identifiers or only declarations?
Alternatively, if they don't have unique identifiers,
Hi.
Has anyone had any experience doing something similar? I would be
interested in seeing similar examples and use cases.
You likely need something similar to what I need:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570953.html
Martin
Thanks!
On 6/29/21 6:27 AM, David Brown wrote:
On 28/06/2021 21:06, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
I wrote an article for the Red Hat Developer blog about how
to annotate code to get the most out of GCC's access checking
warnings like -Warray-bounds, -Wformat-overflow, and
-Wstringop-overflow. The article
> >In particular can you explain the motivation behind all the changes in the
> >gcc/ada/doc directory?
>
> Sure:
> 1) All Sphinx manuals live in a directory where index page is called
> index.rst. That's why
> I moved e.g. this: gcc/ada/doc/{gnat_rm.rst => gnat_rm/index.rst}
> 2) I moved latex_e
AIM for today :
- filter out the the nodes which already have an supergraph edge representing
the call to avoid creating another edge for call
- create enode for destination
- create eedge representing the call itself
—
PROGRESS :
- in order to filter out only the relevant edges, I simply use
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:09:23 +0200
> Cc: GCC Development , gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
>
> On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
> > version also available for review?
>
> I've just uploaded them
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:57:11 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, jos...@codesourcery.com
>
> Or how about this:
>
> `Overall Options'
>
>See Options Controlling the Kind of Output.
>
>*note -c. *note -S. *note -E. *note -o.
On 29/06/2021 17:50, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/29/21 6:27 AM, David Brown wrote:
>> On 28/06/2021 21:06, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
>>> I wrote an article for the Red Hat Developer blog about how
>>> to annotate code to get the most out of GCC's access checking
>>> warnings like -Warray-bounds, -
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 22:04 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> AIM for today :
>
> - filter out the the nodes which already have an supergraph edge
> representing the call to avoid creating another edge for call
> - create enode for destination
> - create eedge representing the call itself
>
> —
>
> P
On 6/28/21 6:32 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I had changed my approach to passing -Wno-free-nonheap-object in the
Makefile. Can you try disabling the Makefile bit and bootstrapping,
cause that was still failing.
I see. I just tested it and my patch does let the existing #pragma
suppress the warn
On 6/29/21 12:50 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/06/2021 11:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
https://splichal.eu/gccsphi
On 6/30/21 12:16 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 6:32 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I had changed my approach to passing -Wno-free-nonheap-object in the
Makefile. Can you try disabling the Makefile bit and bootstrapping,
cause that was still failing.
I see. I just tested it and my patch do
15 matches
Mail list logo
