On June 13, 2021 4:03:16 AM GMT+02:00, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 5:21 PM Andrew Pinski
>wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 4:54 PM Andrew Pinski
>wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> > While moving the simple A CMP 0 ? A : -A patterns from
>> > fold_cond_expr_with_comparison to ma
> On 08-Jun-2021, at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> Is there a URL for your branch?
no, currently it only local branch on my machine. Should I upload it on a
hosting site ( like GitHub ) ? or can I create a branch on remote also ?
> The issue is that the analyzer currently divides calls
On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 19:11 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
>
> > On 08-Jun-2021, at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > Is there a URL for your branch?
>
> no, currently it only local branch on my machine. Should I upload it on
> a hosting site ( like GitHub ) ? or can I create a branch on
Show 0-based offsets for std::tuple members, to match with std::get.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdTuplePrinter): don't increment
self.count until after generating the result string.
---
libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py | 13 +++
std::tuple elements are retrieved via std::get<> (template) not
[] (array); have the generated output string match this.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdTuplePrinter): Use <> not [].
---
The previous patch seems uncontroversial to me. I don't know about this
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:03 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/11/21 3:37 PM, Markus Faehling wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm currently facing a problem where I cannot get both gcc and clang
> > warning-free simultaneously in my project. My code looks somewhat like
> > this:
> >
> > class Test {
> >
Hi All!
While building I started to get this error:
../../gcc-master/gcc/opts.c: In function ‘void
print_filtered_help(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned
int, gcc_options*, unsigned int)’:
../../gcc-master/gcc/opts.c:1497:26: error: ‘ ’ directive output may be
truncated wri
On 6/9/2021 5:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
code. I'd like to discuss the possibility of replacing the current
backwards threader with
Snapshot gcc-12-20210613 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20210613/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:02 AM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/9/2021 5:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Hi Jeff. Hi folks.
> >
> > What started as a foray into severing the old (forward) threader's
> > dependency on evrp, turned into a rewrite of the backwards threader
> > code. I'd like
10 matches
Mail list logo