On 6/7/21 11:26 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:30:22 +0200
Martin Liška wrote:
Anyway, this is resolved as I use more appropriate directive:
https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/gfortran/_build/html/intrinsic-procedures/access-checks-file-access-modes.html
ISTM there
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2021 at 6:10 AM
> From: "Giacomo Tesio"
> To: "Jason Merrill"
> Cc: "Jakub Jelinek" , "gcc Mailing List"
> Subject: Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On June 7, 2021 5:24:12 PM UTC, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > Why would someone bother to
ping.
There is still time to add more topics/key participants to the MC
proposal.
If interested in participating, please let us know in jema...@gnu.org
and ndesaulni...@google.com.
Thanks!
> Hi people!
>
> This year the Linux Plumbers Conference (https://linuxplumbersconf.org) will
> be fully
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2021 at 2:17 AM
> From: "Giacomo Tesio"
> To: "David Edelsohn"
> Cc: "Jakub Jelinek" , "gcc Mailing List"
> Subject: Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy
>
> Hi David,
>
> On June 7, 2021 1:26:52 PM UTC, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >
> > > It's a breaking change,
>> Also, are there many non-FSF-assigned contribution in the development
>> branch already?
>
>I'm not aware of any anywhere yet.
adec14811714e22a6c1f7f0199adc05370f0d8b0
96963713f6a648a0ed890450e02ebdd8ff583b14
621ea10ca060ba19ec693aa73b5e29d553cca849
3e5f2425f80aedd00f28235022a2755eb46f310d
ee95
(This should have been on the gcc-help list.)
> I may be remembering wrong, but -- doesn't dynamic_cast look for a vtable?
It uses a vtable if one is present, it can't cause one to be
introduced, so ...
>So if you do a dynamic cast mentioning that class you'd get such a reference.
No.
> Or is
> On 01-Jun-2021, at 6:38 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> - able to build the analyzer from source *quickly*, for hacking on the
> code. i.e. with --disable-bootstrap. We want to minimize the time it
> takes to, say, hack in a print statement into a single .cc file in the
> analyzer subdirector
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 21:20 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
>
> > On 01-Jun-2021, at 6:38 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
[...snip...]
> > Maybe it's best to have an
> > account on the GCC compile farm for this:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
> > IIRC you already have such an account.
Hi.
The Mission Statement of the GCC project recently changed without any
announcement.
I am not a contributor to GCC, merely a user.
However, I'd like to understand more, especially about the
transparency of the project.
The GCC Steering Committee is supposed to follow the mission statement
as
On 6/9/21 10:13 AM, Valentino Giudice via Gcc wrote:
Hi.
The Mission Statement of the GCC project recently changed without any
announcement.
Well there was an announcement; the changes in the mission statement
reflect the new reality introduced by that announcement:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipe
Thank you.
> Well there was an announcement; the changes in the mission statement reflect
> the new reality introduced by that announcement:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-June/236182.html
>
> Siddhesh
I was aware of that announcement, but it doesn't mention the mission
statement at
On 6/9/21 10:39 AM, Valentino Giudice wrote:
I was aware of that announcement, but it doesn't mention the mission
statement at all.
It appears that the decision in question was, at the time, in contrast
with the mission statement (rather than guided by it).
If the Steering Committee updates the
Le 09/06/2021 à 07:09, Valentino Giudice via Gcc a écrit :
> If the Steering Committee updates the mission statement, it may appear
> that the mission statement follows the decisions of the steering
> committee (in place of the contrary). In that case, what would be the
> purpose of a mission state
13 matches
Mail list logo
