On 6/3/21 7:16 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/2/21 6:44 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, Joel Sherrill wrote:
For RTEMS, we switched from texinfo to Sphinx and the dependency
on Python3 for Sphinx has caused a bit of hassle. Is this going to b
Hello,
On 13.05.21 13:45, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/1/21 3:30 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
That said, I'm asking the GCC community for a green light before I
invest
more time on it?
So far, I've received just a small feedback about the transition. In
most cases positive.
[1] https://splichal.eu/scr
Hi everyone,
For those interested, you find the meeting notes of our call over on:
https://github.com/Rust-GCC/Reporting/blob/main/2021-06-04-community-call.md
Thanks,
--Phil
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 12:33, Philip Herron
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just a reminder that tomorrow is the community ca
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 3:55 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 13.05.21 13:45, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 4/1/21 3:30 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> That said, I'm asking the GCC community for a green light before I
>>> invest
>>> more time on it?
>> So far, I've received just a small feedba
On 6/3/21 4:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/2/21 10:41 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/31/21 7:25 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I've made quite some progress with the porting of the documentation and
I would like to present it to the community now:
https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/
Hello.
Hi,
I wonder if we could replace the register asm construct for
inline assemblies with something a bit nicer and more obvious.
E.g. turning this (real world example from IBM Z kernel code):
int diag8_response(int cmdlen, char *response, int *rlen)
{
register unsigned long reg2 asm ("2") =
> On Jun 4, 2021, at 2:02 PM, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if we could replace the register asm construct for
> inline assemblies with something a bit nicer and more obvious.
> E.g. turning this (real world example from IBM Z kernel code):
>
> int diag8_response(int cm
I found the problem, and it was a mistake I made elsewhere that resulted in
%edx being busy everywhere. I have fixed it and consider the issue resolved.
Richard Barnes
From: Barnes, Richard
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 3:59 PM
To: H.J. Lu
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Sub
On 6/4/21 8:18 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
...
> Yes, I would think this should be made a general mechanism that any target
> could use.
>
> I wonder if instead of creating a new mechanism you could do this simply by
> creating new constraint names, where each name matches exactly one hard
> registe
Snapshot gcc-10-20210604 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20210604/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
10 matches
Mail list logo
