Status
==
The GCC 9 branch is now frozen for the upcoming GCC 9.4 release.
I will announce a first release candidate shortly.
All changes require release manager approval now.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- --
The first release candidate for GCC 9.4 is available from
https://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.4.0-RC-20210519/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
8091c46cf736124a106922ddfd1fdb99f33b0241.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate
on
On Wed, 19 May 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 9.4 is available from
>
> https://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.4.0-RC-20210519/
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
> 8091c46cf736124a106922ddfd1fdb99
Hi Nathan:
Recently I am clean up the failed case for bare-matel riscv64 target,
and that not support omp due to lack of pthread support (e.g.
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/omp-1_a), however even I add
`dg-require-effective-target pthread`, `dg-module-cmi` seems still try
to test and then get faile
Hi all,
There is an agenda for tomorrow's meeting. If you have topics to
discuss or share, please let me know and I can add them to the agenda.
## Agenda:
1. Document ELF attribute section
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/pull/71
2. Calling conventions for the lazily bound functi
Recently I have noticed a post going around various FOSS circles about
Freenode changing hands:
https://gist.github.com/joepie91/df80d8d36cd9d1bde46ba018af497409
I also checked the GCC wiki, and on both its main page and its
GCConIRC page it advertises an IRC channel on Freenode for GCC:
https://gc
>Of course, that would require coming up with a new name for the one
>being migrated from Freenode, so that it doesn't clash with the
>existing GCC channel on OFTC
For consistency with the mailing lists, #gcc-help seems like an
obvious choice (if we do want to move it to OFTC rather than
libera.ch
