JojoR via Gcc writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a little know about for 'Sizes and offsets as runtime
> invariants’,
>
> and need to add vector types like V2SImode as compile-time constants
> with enabled vector types of runtime invariants.
>
> Could I enable two vector types at sa
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 5:40 AM JojoR via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a little know about for 'Sizes and offsets as runtime
> invariants’,
>
> and need to add vector types like V2SImode as compile-time constants
> with enabled vector types of runtime invariants.
>
>
Hi all,
I`m using GCC 9.3 AutoFDO and the old version create_gcov on arm64
and it works well. Actually it support not only LBR like mode but
also inst_retired even cycles event, which`s the early implementation
of AutoFDO[1]. There is no difference in output format of create_gcov
between LBR
I've been going through old Linux kernel CVEs, trying to prototype some
possible new warnings for -fanalyzer in GCC 12 (and, alas, finding
places where the analyzer internals need work...)
I think I want a way for the user to be able to mark security
boundaries in their code: for example:
* in the
The C front end (and perhaps others as well) creates internal
variables in a few places, such as in convert_lvalue_to_rvalue
like so:
/* Remove the qualifiers for the rest of the expressions and
create the VAL temp variable to hold the RHS. */
nonatomic_type = build_qualifie
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:22:15AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> The C front end (and perhaps others as well) creates internal
> variables in a few places, such as in convert_lvalue_to_rvalue
> like so:
>
> /* Remove the qualifiers for the rest of the expressions and
>create t
On 4/29/21 11:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:22:15AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
The C front end (and perhaps others as well) creates internal
variables in a few places, such as in convert_lvalue_to_rvalue
like so:
/* Remove the qualifiers for the rest of t
On 4/29/21 11:18 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
I've been going through old Linux kernel CVEs, trying to prototype some
possible new warnings for -fanalyzer in GCC 12 (and, alas, finding
places where the analyzer internals need work...)
I think I want a way for the user to be able to mark security
bou
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:54:27AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> On 4/29/21 11:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:22:15AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> > > The C front end (and perhaps others as well) creates internal
> > > variables in a few places, such as in
Snapshot gcc-9-20210429 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20210429/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
* Feng Xue:
> To simplify explanation of this memory gathering optimization, pseudo
> code on original nested loops is given as:
>
> outer-loop ( ) { /* data in inner loop are also invariant in outer loop. */
> ...
> inner-loop (iter, iter_count) { /* inner loop to apply MGO */
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
