broken check: You should edit tm.texi.in rather than tm.texi

2020-11-20 Thread Martin Liška
Hello. I hit the following issue: /bin/sh /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/../move-if-change tmp-tm.texi tm.texi You should edit /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi.in rather than /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi . Steps to reproduce: 1) modify target.def 2) you will see:

Re: broken check: You should edit tm.texi.in rather than tm.texi

2020-11-20 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:24 AM Martin Liška wrote: > > Hello. > > I hit the following issue: > /bin/sh /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/../move-if-change tmp-tm.texi tm.texi > You should edit /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi.in rather than > /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/doc/tm.te

Re: broken check: You should edit tm.texi.in rather than tm.texi

2020-11-20 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/20/20 2:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: Should contrib/gcc_update handle it? I don't know how publicly known is the script? I personally do not used it. Martin

Re: broken check: You should edit tm.texi.in rather than tm.texi

2020-11-20 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/20/20 4:26 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 11/20/20 2:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: Should contrib/gcc_update handle it? I don't know how publicly known is the script? I personally do not used it. Martin ... or we can add a hint: diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in index 778ec09c75d..f

Re: broken check: You should edit tm.texi.in rather than tm.texi

2020-11-20 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:26 AM Martin Liška wrote: > > On 11/20/20 2:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > > Should contrib/gcc_update handle it? > > I don't know how publicly known is the script? > I personally do not used it. > I always run $ ./contrib/gcc_update --touch after rebase. -- H.J.

DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion

2020-11-20 Thread Alexander Yermolovich via Gcc
Hello On llvm side of compiler world there has been work done by Igor Kudrin to enable DWARF64. I am trying to add a flag to Clang to enable DWARF64 generation. https://reviews.llvm.org/D90507 In review David Blaikie pointed out that there has been a discussion on what to call this flag: https:

gcc-9-20201120 is now available

2020-11-20 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-9-20201120 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20201120/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: DWARF64 gcc/clang flag discussion

2020-11-20 Thread m...@klomp.org
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:22:26PM +, Alexander Yermolovich wrote: > On llvm side of compiler world there has been work done by Igor Kudrin to > enable DWARF64. > I am trying to add a flag to Clang to enable DWARF64 generation. > https://reviews.llvm.org/D90507 > In review David Blaikie point

Re: Incremental updating of SSA_NAMEs that are passed to b_c_p

2020-11-20 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 10/27/20 12:34 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to revive the old discussion regarding the interaction of > jump threading and b_c_p causing the latter to incorrectly return 1 in > certain cases: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/547236.html > https://gcc.g