Re: Automatically generated ChangeLog files - script

2020-07-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 7/7/20 4:14 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Sorry it took me so long to get back to this. Don't worry! On Jun 24, 2020, Martin Liška wrote: Please escape the '[': +end_of_location_regex = re.compile(r'[\[<(:]') check and please a test-case for it. check Thanks, I've made the changes;

RE: DW_OP_implict_value usage and motivation

2020-07-07 Thread Tomar, Sourabh Singh
Hi Jakub, Thanks for clarifying this. I went through literature and other stuff available, it describes operation and semantics. Unfortunately I wasn't able to get to the actual DWARF Issue/proposal when it was proposed. One small doubt still remains. It seems(to me) that DW_OP_stack_value and

Re: DW_OP_implict_value usage and motivation

2020-07-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:26:58AM +, Tomar, Sourabh Singh wrote: > Thanks for clarifying this. I went through literature and other stuff > available, it describes operation and semantics. Unfortunately I wasn't > able to get to the actual DWARF Issue/proposal when it was proposed. > > One s

GCC usage script

2020-07-07 Thread Martin Liška
Hey. Some of you may know Honza's images about CPU utilization and memory usage when using LTO [1]. Last week I played with Chromium and Firefox and I wanted to visualize their utilization. That's why I came up with a new script [2]. You can easily wrap a command and the script generates graphs

Re: GCC usage script

2020-07-07 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hey. > > Some of you may know Honza's images about CPU utilization and memory usage > when using LTO [1]. Last week I played with Chromium and Firefox and I wanted > to visualize their utilization. That's why I came up with a new script [2]. > > You can easily wrap a command and the script gene

Re: GCC usage script

2020-07-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 7/7/20 12:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: Hey. Some of you may know Honza's images about CPU utilization and memory usage when using LTO [1]. Last week I played with Chromium and Firefox and I wanted to visualize their utilization. That's why I came up with a new script [2]. You can easily wrap a

a small typo in the documentation, FYI

2020-07-07 Thread Nino Pereira via Gcc
The top line in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.3/gfortran/BOZ-literal-constants.html says " The syntax is: `prefix quote digits quote', were the prefix is either b, o or z," Here, 'were' must be 'where' HTH, Nino

Re: a small typo in the documentation, FYI

2020-07-07 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 15:41, Nino Pereira via Gcc wrote: > > The top line in > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.3/gfortran/BOZ-literal-constants.html > > says " The syntax is: `prefix quote digits quote', were the prefix is > either b, o or z," > > Here, 'were' must be 'where' Thanks. That