Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 4/2/20 2:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 02:19:10PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: Am 20.03.20 um 18:37 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc: Hi - Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs. Further, URLs such as https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > > The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other > > branches) using approx. > > git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}' > > where $rev is 2000 in your case. > > > > Jaku

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 4/3/20 10:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other branches) using approx. git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}' where $rev is 2000 in

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 4/3/20 11:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 4/3/20 10:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other branches) using approx. git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1

Re: text/x-* attachments stripped (was: Re: gcc ML archive: text/x-patch attachments no longer shown inline (was:Re: Mailing list stripping off attachments))

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 3/9/20 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:46:31AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: Hi Thomas, hi Overseers I can confirm that those are stripped off! I did sent an email with three attachments: * test.txt (text/plain) * test.diff (text/x-diff) * the company's disclaimer T

mailman customization

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
Hello. I believe we can quite easily customize mailman 2.1 to match our needs. The biggest challenge I see is a proper testing as I don't see it easy to set up a local mailman instance. I've got a patch that changes: - by date sorting will be done in reverse order - default link of e.g. https://

Re: mailman customization

2020-04-03 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc
Hi - > I believe we can quite easily customize mailman 2.1 to match our needs. > The biggest challenge I see is a proper testing as I don't see it easy > to set up a local mailman instance. I've got a patch that changes: I suppose we can do some local RPM respins - as long as these changes are sm

Re: mailman customization

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 4/3/20 5:54 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi - I believe we can quite easily customize mailman 2.1 to match our needs. The biggest challenge I see is a proper testing as I don't see it easy to set up a local mailman instance. I've got a patch that changes: I suppose we can do some local RPM

Re: mailman customization

2020-04-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:58:51PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >On 4/3/20 5:54 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >>Hi - >> >>>I believe we can quite easily customize mailman 2.1 to match our needs. >>>The biggest challenge I see is a proper testing as I don't see it easy >>>to set up a local mailman insta

Re: mailman customization

2020-04-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:54:20AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> I believe we can quite easily customize mailman 2.1 to match our needs. >> The biggest challenge I see is a proper testing as I don't see it easy >> to set up a local mailman instance. I've got a patch that changes: > >I suppose w

Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi, I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, that is I see everyone using: [releases/gcc-9 revision 02a201f71:0f58d3b54:0e66150084aa217811a5c45fb15e98d7ed3e8839] or [master revision 63b2923dc6f:0c89e976db9:1c16f7fc903c1c1c912faf7889b69d83429b7b2e what is the first 2 hashes,

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, > that is I see everyone using: > > [releases/gcc-9 revision > 02a201f71:0f58d3b54:0e66150084aa217811a5c45fb15e98d7ed3e8839] > > or > > [master revision > 63b2923dc6f:0c89e976d

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 4/3/20 7:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, >> that is I see everyone using: >> >> [releases/gcc-9 revision >> 02a201f71:0f58d3b54:0e66150084aa217811a5c45fb15e98d7ed3e8839]

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 4/3/20 7:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, >> that is I see everyone using: >> >> [releases/gcc-9 revision >> 02a201f71:0f58d3b54:0e66150084aa217811a5c45fb15e98d7ed3e883

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:55, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > > > On 4/3/20 7:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, > >> that is I see everyone using: > >> > >> [releases/gcc-9

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > On 4/3/20 7:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, > >> that is I see everyone using: > >> > >> [releases/gcc-9 rev

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 4/3/20 7:57 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:54, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> >> On 4/3/20 7:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: Hi, I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, that is I

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 4/3/20 7:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:55, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> >> >> >> On 4/3/20 7:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: Hi, I have a question about the gcc-testresults mailing list, that

Re: Question about the testresults mailing list

2020-04-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 19:40, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > > > On 4/3/20 7:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:55, Bernd Edlinger > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/3/20 7:50 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 18:45, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > Hi,

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-03 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc
Hi - > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/r2000 > > > maps to a search and you get thousands of hits for SVN: r2000** > > > > The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other > > branches) using approx. > > git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}' > >

gcc-8-20200403 is now available

2020-04-03 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-8-20200403 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200403/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-03 Thread Martin Liška
On 4/3/20 10:19 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi - https://gcc.gnu.org/r2000 maps to a search and you get thousands of hits for SVN: r2000** The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other branches) using approx. git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 |