Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Apr 02 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > What happens to the e-mails when they are not archive, but forwarded > to the subscribers, like mark.info who just subscribes the mails, > and archived them they have a lot of hard disks for that and can > handle attachments quite well. The point is previou

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Richard Sandiford
Bernd Edlinger writes: > On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >>> On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: marc.info is an independent site that is not associated with sourceware.org. We don't control it. If you have questions

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 04:35, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Regarding the overseers, they repeatedly spoke up on this list, > but all the time they use an e-mail that bounces. No. ONE of the overseers replies from a personal email address that bounces, because as the address clearly says, you should cont

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 4/2/20 11:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Bernd Edlinger writes: >> On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >>> On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > marc.info is an independent site that is not associated with > sourc

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 4/2/20 11:09 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 04:35, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> Regarding the overseers, they repeatedly spoke up on this list, >> but all the time they use an e-mail that bounces. > > No. ONE of the overseers replies from a personal email address that > bounces,

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Richard Sandiford
Bernd Edlinger writes: > On 4/2/20 11:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Bernd Edlinger writes: >>> On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> marc.info is an independent site that is no

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Bernd Edlinger
On 4/2/20 11:48 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Bernd Edlinger writes: >> On 4/2/20 11:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> Bernd Edlinger writes: On 4/1/20 8:51 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > On 3/26/20 4:27 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> On 3/26/20 4:16 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-02 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Am 20.03.20 um 18:37 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc: Hi - Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs. Further, URLs such as https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456 are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate the matching Fro

Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

2020-04-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 02:19:10PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Am 20.03.20 um 18:37 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc: > > Hi - > > > > Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs. > > Further, URLs such as > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev > >

Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back

2020-04-02 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > Regarding the overseers, they repeatedly spoke up on this list, > > but all the time they use an e-mail that bounces. > > No. ONE of the overseers replies from a personal email address that > bounces, because as the address clearly says, you