Hi,
Trust you are doing well.
We take this opportunity to know if you would be interested in acquiring the
Attendees & Exhibitors list of Chelsea Antiques Fair- 2020 At uk for
pre-show marketing campaign, networking and various marketing initiatives
The list contains: Company/Firm Name,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:43 PM Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
> On 07/02/2020 15:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:56:08PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2020 13:48, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> Should we require some simple markup in the comm
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Instead of "git am" I had "patch -p1 <",
May I suggest "git apply" instead of the good old patch program.
(The "-p1" is of course built-in and you never have to do a
manual roll-back or separate --dry-run pass.)
brgds, H-P
On 08/02/2020 16:50, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:34:03PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Jason" == Jason Merrill writes:
Jason> I omit ChangeLogs by adding ':!*/ChangeLog' to the end of the git
Jason> send-email command. I don't remember where I found that incantation.
Co
Hello,
CLI Investment Group here in New York, an affiliate of CLI Ventures. We are a
Financial Investment Company looking for Company(s) with profitable projects or
entrepreneurial teams that require partnership. We are focusing on supporting
early to late stage Companies. If interested, please
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:51:10PM +, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> Just for anyone interested -- the manpage that describes the '!' is
> `gitglossary`.
>
> It's under the description of `pathspec`, and has a long-form of
> `:(exclude)`.
https://github.com/git/git/commit/93dbefb389a011c9107a39
GCC never evaluates __atomic_is_lock_free to 0.
(gcc/builtins.c:fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free)
I'd like to change clang to eagerly evaluate __atomic_is_lock_free to 0 for
apparently oversized types.
This helps some platforms to avoid a dependency on libatomic.
Either of the following cho
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:35 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> GCC never evaluates __atomic_is_lock_free to 0.
> (gcc/builtins.c:fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free)
Huh?
/* We need a corresponding integer mode for the access to be lock-free. */
size = INTVAL (expand_normal (arg0)) * BITS_PER_UNI
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:40 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:35 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
> >
> > GCC never evaluates __atomic_is_lock_free to 0.
> > (gcc/builtins.c:fold_builtin_atomic_always_lock_free)
>
> Huh?
Oh it is this, you quoted the wrong function which made things
