Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>
> > This has the effect that e.g. after
> >
> > -ffast-math -fno-finite-math-only
> >
> > the __FAST_MATH__ macro is no longer predefined, but after
> >
> > -ffast-math -fno-associative-math
> >
> > the __FAST_MATH__ macro
[updated, following some comments from Gerald, main differences are
slight tweaks to the html markup and changing "email" to "e-mail"]
This patch proposes some new (additional) rules for email subject lines
when contributing to GCC. The goal is to make sure that, as far as
possible, the subject
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:52:00PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> [updated, following some comments from Gerald, main differences are
> slight tweaks to the html markup and changing "email" to "e-mail"]
>
> This patch proposes some new (additional) rules for email subject lines
> when c
On 21/01/2020 15:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:52:00PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
[updated, following some comments from Gerald, main differences are
slight tweaks to the html markup and changing "email" to "e-mail"]
This patch proposes some new (additional)
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:33:22PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> > Some examples would be useful I'd say, e.g. it is unclear in what way you
> > want the PR number to be appended, shall it be
> > something: whatever words describe it PR12345
> > or
> > something: whatever words describe
On 21/01/2020 15:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:33:22PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Some examples would be useful I'd say, e.g. it is unclear in what way you
want the PR number to be appended, shall it be
something: whatever words describe it PR12345
or
something:
Can you please remove the hook for user branches likes:
$ git push origin me/filter-non-common
Enumerating objects: 27, done.
Counting objects: 100% (27/27), done.
Delta compression using up to 16 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (14/14), done.
Writing objects: 100% (14/14), 1.77 KiB | 1.77 MiB/
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Can you please remove the hook for user branches likes:
>
> $ git push origin me/filter-non-common
> Enumerating objects: 27, done.
> Counting objects: 100% (27/27), done.
> Delta compression using up to 16 threads
> Compressing objects: 100% (
On 21/01/2020 16:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Martin Liška wrote:
Can you please remove the hook for user branches likes:
$ git push origin me/filter-non-common
Enumerating objects: 27, done.
Counting objects: 100% (27/27), done.
Delta compression using up to 16 th
On 1/21/20 11:38 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/01/2020 16:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Martin Liška wrote:
Can you please remove the hook for user branches likes:
$ git push origin me/filter-non-common
Enumerating objects: 27, done.
Counting objects: 1
On 21/01/2020 16:43, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 1/21/20 11:38 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/01/2020 16:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Martin Liška wrote:
Can you please remove the hook for user branches likes:
$ git push origin me/filter-non-common
Enumer
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> It looks like there's multiple cases here. For the two flags
> -fassociative-math and -freciprocal-math, it seems to have happened just as
> you describe: they were created (split out of -funsafe-math-optimizations)
> in commit a1a826110720eda37c73f829
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:52 AM Richard Earnshaw (lists) <
richard.earns...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 21/01/2020 16:43, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > On 1/21/20 11:38 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >> On 21/01/2020 16:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Martin Liška wrot
On 1/21/20 10:40 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/01/2020 15:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:33:22PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Some examples would be useful I'd say, e.g. it is unclear in what
way you
want the PR number to be appended, shall it be
some
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 17:06, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:52 AM Richard Earnshaw (lists) <
> richard.earns...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > On 21/01/2020 16:43, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > > On 1/21/20 11:38 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> > >> On 21/01/2020 16:14, Jonathan Wak
On 21/01/2020 17:20, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/21/20 10:40 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 21/01/2020 15:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 03:33:22PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
Some examples would be useful I'd say, e.g. it is unclear in what
way you
want the
This patch documents some of the scripts that I've published for
managing the personal and vendor spaces on the server. It also covers
some of the other features that those scripts enable, so that it's all
in one place. This is a complete rewrite of the material I had written
previously since
Hi!
Thanks for doing this.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:52:00PM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> This patch proposes some new (additional) rules for email subject lines
> when contributing to GCC. The goal is to make sure that, as far as
> possible, the subject for a patch will form a good
On 1/21/20 6:30 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Whether they make it to trunk or not doesn't really change the fact
that a one-word message is poor. If it's only on your local machine,
do what you like. The hook only complains when such a commit is
published on gcc.gnu.org.
I would disagree here. I
Hello everyone,
I am trying to see how a new type qualifier only for pointer variables is
suitable to be in standard semantically. I have this thread (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg02015.html ) where Joseph
discussed a bit about what a new type qualifier should satisfy. Can
somebo
20 matches
Mail list logo
