On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 10:49 +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:29:48PM +, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > I have a question about building a toolchain that uses (at run
> > time) a
> > dynamic linker and system libraries and headers that are in a non-
> > standard
> > place.
>
> I h
* Steve Ellcey:
> I would like these used by default so I took some ideas from
> --with-advance-toolchain and used that to automatically add these options
> to LINK_SPEC (see attached patch). I can compile and link a program with
> this setup, but when I run the program I get:
>
> % ./x
> Inconsi
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 18:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Steve Ellcey:
>
> > I would like these used by default so I took some ideas from
> > --with-advance-toolchain and used that to automatically add these options
> > to LINK_SPEC (see attached patch). I can compile and link a program wi
Steve Ellcey writes:
> I have a question about building a toolchain that uses (at run time) a
> dynamic linker and system libraries and headers that are in a non-standard
> place.
>
> I just noticed the IBM --with-advance-toolchain option and I would
> like to replicate it for aarch64.
>
> Let me
Snapshot gcc-7-20191010 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20191010/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
Some of you may be aware of the recently released joint statement on the
GNU project. Like Carlos, I have signed that joint statement as an
individual.
I would encourage all contributors to read the statement and, if you
want to sign the statement or have questions, please contact Carlos
off-li
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 15:38 -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>
> > Let me first describe what I do now:
> >
> > configure/build BINUTILS with --prefix=${X} --with-sysroot=${X}
> > configure/build an initial GCC (all-gcc all-target-libgcc) with
> > --prefix=${X} --with-sysroot=${
Hi,
I recently experimented with changes to libgcc's DWARF unwinder, aimed
at improving performance on Android, and I'm wondering if upstream
would be interested in a patch.
The most interesting change modified the cache in unwind-dw2-fde-dip.c
to help even when the dlpi_adds and dlpi_subs fields
