On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>
> On 9/17/19 2:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings Richard,
> >>
> >> I don't know if it's currently possible but whats the best way to either so
> >> about or
> >>
> >> use a tool to expose
Hi,
I'm currently trying to add -Wshadow=local to the gcc build rules.
I started with -Wshadow, but gave up that idea immediately.
As you could expect the current code base has plenty of shadowed
local variables. Most are trivial to resolve, some are less trivial.
I am not finished yet, but it i
On 9/18/19 3:08 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to add -Wshadow=local to the gcc build rules.
> I started with -Wshadow, but gave up that idea immediately.
>
> As you could expect the current code base has plenty of shadowed
> local variables. Most are trivial to resolve
> "Bernd" == Bernd Edlinger writes:
Bernd> I'm currently trying to add -Wshadow=local to the gcc build rules.
Bernd> I started with -Wshadow, but gave up that idea immediately.
Bernd> As you could expect the current code base has plenty of shadowed
Bernd> local variables. Most are trivial t
On 9/18/19 4:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Nicholas Krause wrote:
On 9/17/19 2:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Greetings Richard,
I don't know if it's currently possible but whats the best way to either so
about or
use a tool t
I'm trying to build new functions on the fly during optimization.
For those of you that have not been following my previous questions,
this is structure reorganization optimization related. For example when
somebody frees an array of type fu, I'd like to build a new
function _reorg_free_fu which do
Greetings,
I'm not as familar of the currrent Makefile internals for GCC, so what
is the best
way to add -pg for profiling. Seems I need to add it for gprof in order
to get
some real data for multi-threading GCC internals.
Thanks,
NIck
Hi,
I read through previous messages which tried to support livepatching
in kernel for AArch64.
Following is the patch supporting mfentry:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00756.html
And this is the last message about above thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01093.ht
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:24 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I read through previous messages which tried to support livepatching
> in kernel for AArch64.
> Following is the patch supporting mfentry:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00756.html
> And this is the last message about abov
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:56 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:24 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I read through previous messages which tried to support livepatching
> > in kernel for AArch64.
> > Following is the patch supporting mfentry:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:02 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:56 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:24 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I read through previous messages which tried to support livepatching
> > > in kernel for AArch64.
> > > Fol
11 matches
Mail list logo
