Hi!
I just stumbled over [1] and just wanted to add that Debian is reguarly
building snapshots of all current gcc versions for a large number of
targets, including the testsuites (except for m68k and sh4 at the moment).
The results can always be found on buildd.debian.org.
gcc-7:
https://buil
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> You mean the email notification sent by the hooks when a commit
> gets pushed? If yes, here is an example:
>
> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2019-09/msg00041.html
Thank you, Joel! I got a little worried how to best parse that ;-),
but then Jos
At the Cauldron this weekend the overwhelming view for the move to GIT
soon was finally expressed.
But we never discussed when and we didn't really decide which conversion
we would use from the three that we currently have on the table.
So during the cauldron dinner I discussed with several p
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:02 PM Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
> At the Cauldron this weekend the overwhelming view for the move to GIT
> soon was finally expressed.
>
> But we never discussed when and we didn't really decide which conversion
> we would use from the three that we currently have
> > You mean the email notification sent by the hooks when a commit
> > gets pushed? If yes, here is an example:
> >
> > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2019-09/msg00041.html
>
> Thank you, Joel! I got a little worried how to best parse that ;-),
> but then Joseph recommended against it an
On 17/09/2019 13:24, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:02 PM Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
At the Cauldron this weekend the overwhelming view for the move to GIT
soon was finally expressed.
But we never discussed when and we didn't really decide which conversion
we would use f
On 9/17/19 2:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Greetings Richard,
I don't know if it's currently possible but whats the best way to either so
about or
use a tool to expose shared state at both the GIMPLE and RTL level. This
would
allow us to figure o
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> When, roughly, do you expect the switch can be ready?
That's a matter of how much time we want to allow for people to try out
and comment on the conversion.
> I assume we'll have some sort of flag day?
Yes, at some point we'd do a final conversion a
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> Doing this over the new year holiday period has both advantages and
> disadvantages. On the one hand the traffic is light, so the impact to most
> developers will be quite low; on the other, it is a holiday period, so getting
> the right key
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> If stage3 ends on Dec 31st then stage1 ends Oct 31st to have a two-month
> stage3. That's about two weeks earlier than in the past.
I don't think the repository conversion should constrain the timing of the
end of stage 1 or stage 3; it should be OK
On 17/09/2019 17:35, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> If stage3 ends on Dec 31st then stage1 ends Oct 31st to have a two-month
>> stage3. That's about two weeks earlier than in the past.
>
> I don't think the repository conversion should constrain the timing
Hi People!
As promised during the GNU Tools Cauldron last week, I just submitted a
devroom proposal for the next edition of FOSDEM. Let's see what they
say... I will know the next 30th of September.
Salud!
12 matches
Mail list logo
