Re: [PATCH] Deprecate -frepo option.

2019-09-09 Thread Martin Liška
On 9/6/19 4:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:48:53AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 08:58:48AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >>> Ok, hopefully nobody is strongly against. I've just retested the >>> patch and installed it as r275450. >> >> --- a/gcc/c-fam

Re: [PATCH] Deprecate -frepo option.

2019-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:02:32PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > On 9/6/19 4:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:48:53AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 08:58:48AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > >>> Ok, hopefully nobody is strongly against. I've just ret

[PATCH] Update comment of removed options.

2019-09-09 Thread Martin Liška
On 9/9/19 1:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:02:32PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >> On 9/6/19 4:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:48:53AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 08:58:48AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > Ok, hopefull

Re: [PATCH] Update comment of removed options.

2019-09-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 12:24, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 9/9/19 1:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:02:32PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > >> On 9/6/19 4:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:48:53AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 20

Re: [PATCH] Update comment of removed options.

2019-09-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:24:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > You are right. What about the suggested patch? Can you please quickly (say with svn blame) double check whether the descriptions weren't actually right but misleading (an option could be deprecated in N and removed in N+1 or so, so se

Re: [PATCH] Update comment of removed options.

2019-09-09 Thread Martin Liška
On 9/9/19 1:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:24:53PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: >> You are right. What about the suggested patch? > > Can you please quickly (say with svn blame) double check whether the > descriptions weren't actually right but misleading (an option could >

Re: [PATCH] Update comment of removed options.

2019-09-09 Thread Theodore Papadopoulo
On 9/9/19 1:34 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: frepo C++ ObjC++ Deprecated Deprecated in GCC 10. This switch has no effect. >>> >>> This first part looks wrong to me. >>> "deprecated >>> (computing) Obsolescent; said of a construct in a computing language >>> considered old, >>> and pl

GNU Mes 0.20 released

2019-09-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
We are pleased to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.20, representing 147 commits over 38 weeks. Mes has now brought the Reduced Binary Seed bootstrap to Guix (bootstrap a GNU/Linux system without binary GNU toolchain or equivalent). It should land in Guix master any day now: a big thank you to e

Is GIMPLE stable?

2019-09-09 Thread Mateus Carmo Martins de Freitas Barbosa
There's an ongoing discussion on the rustc forum () on implementing a GCC front-end for the Rust compiler, and the issue of whether GIMPLE is stable was brought up. Namely, if a compiler front-end w

Re: Is GIMPLE stable?

2019-09-09 Thread Ian Lance Taylor via gcc
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:09 PM Mateus Carmo Martins de Freitas Barbosa wrote: > > There's an ongoing discussion on the rustc forum > () > on implementing a GCC front-end for the Rust compiler, and