مُرسل من هاتف Huawei الخاص بي
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 06:11:58PM +0900, 김규래 wrote:
> I'm currently having trouble implementing the thread sleeping mechanism when
> the queue is out of tasks.
> Problem is, it's hard to maintain consistency between the thread sleeping
> routine and the queues.
> See the pseudocode below,
>
>
> I thought we don't want to go lock-free, the queue operations > aren't easily
> implementable lock-free, but instead with a lock for each of > the queues,
Hi,
By lock-free I meant to use locks only for the queues,
But my terminology was indeed confusing sorry about that.
> mean we don't in so
The first release candidate for GCC 9.2 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.2.0-RC-20190805/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.2.0-RC-20190805
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 274111.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release
Status
==
The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- -
On 8/5/19 8:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 9.2 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.2.0-RC-20190805/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.2.0-RC-20190805
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 274111.
I have
On 8/5/19 7:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Status
==
The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
Can I get an approval to backport the fix for pr90947 - [9
