Re: ICE with precompiled headers (GCC 8.1)

2019-05-02 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 5/1/19 10:56 AM, Paul Smith wrote: On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 09:35 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Unfortunately my GCC is heavily optimized and stripped so backtraces are useless. I will generate a debuggable GCC and see if I can get more info on the ICE. I have created a GCC with debug enabled so I

Re: __attribute__((early_branch))

2019-05-02 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:53 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On 4/30/19 12:34 PM, cmdLP #CODE wrote: > > Hello GCC-team, > > > > I use GCC for all my C and C++ programs. I know how to use GCC, but I am > > not a contributor to GCC (yet). I often discover some problems C and C++ > > code have in general. Th

Re: What is the precise definition of NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG?

2019-05-02 Thread Matthew Malcomson
On 01/05/19 20:40, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 03:48:02PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 4/30/19 11:24 AM, Matthew Malcomson wrote: >>> That was why I ended up suggesting multiple notes -- it's currently >>> trying to satisfy more than one criteria and they're not quite compat

Re: Second GCC 9.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2019-05-02 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Jakub, > The second release candidate for GCC 9.1 is available from > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.0.1-RC-20190430/ > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9.0.1-RC-20190430 > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 270689. > > I have so far bootstrapped

Re: What is the precise definition of NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG?

2019-05-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 01:02:14PM +, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > On 01/05/19 20:40, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 03:48:02PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 4/30/19 11:24 AM, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > >>> That was why I ended up suggesting multiple notes -- it's currentl

Re: __attribute__((early_branch))

2019-05-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 02:17:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:53 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > This is loop unswitching. It's a standard GCC optimization. If it's > > not working as well as it should, we're far better off determining why > > and fixing the automatic transf

Re: Second GCC 9.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2019-05-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:47:33PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > I've now tested this RC on i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] and > sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01]. The only issue (apart from the just-fixed > spellcheck-options-5.c testcase) is > > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr90178.c scan-assembler-times xorl[t >

Re: Second GCC 9.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2019-05-02 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Segher, > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:47:33PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: >> I've now tested this RC on i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] and >> sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01]. The only issue (apart from the just-fixed >> spellcheck-options-5.c testcase) is >> >> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr90178.c scan-assembler-t

Re: Second GCC 9.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2019-05-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 08:41:29PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Segher, > > > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:47:33PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > >> I've now tested this RC on i386-pc-solaris2.1[01] and > >> sparc-sun-solaris2.1[01]. The only issue (apart from the just-fixed > >> spellcheck-options-

gcc-7-20190502 is now available

2019-05-02 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-7-20190502 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20190502/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7