Re: [arm] Too strict linker assert?

2019-04-10 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 00:30, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > On 09/04/2019 13:26, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While building a newlib-based arm-eabi toolchain with > > --with-multilib-list=rmprofile, I faced a linker assertion failure in > > elf32_arm_merge_eabi_attributes (bfd/elf32-arm.c

Re: [arm] Too strict linker assert?

2019-04-10 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 10/04/2019 10:16, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 00:30, Richard Earnshaw > wrote: >> >> On 09/04/2019 13:26, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> While building a newlib-based arm-eabi toolchain with >>> --with-multilib-list=rmprofile, I faced a linker assertion failure in >>

Documentation style for options with optional levels

2019-04-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
For options that can be used as -foo or -foo=level we have a variety of different styels for documenting what the default level is. See below for several examples. I find this a bit confusing when try to see what it means to use the option without a level. Do we want to pick a style and try to be

Re: [arm] Too strict linker assert?

2019-04-10 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 11:42, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 10/04/2019 10:16, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 00:30, Richard Earnshaw > > wrote: > >> > >> On 09/04/2019 13:26, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> While building a newlib-based arm-eabi toolchain

Re: Documentation style for options with optional levels

2019-04-10 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 4/10/19 7:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: For options that can be used as -foo or -foo=level we have a variety of different styels for documenting what the default level is. See below for several examples. I find this a bit confusing when try to see what it means to use the option without a leve

Re: Documentation style for options with optional levels

2019-04-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 10/04/19 08:42 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: On 4/10/19 7:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: For options that can be used as -foo or -foo=level we have a variety of different styels for documenting what the default level is. See below for several examples. I find this a bit confusing when try to se

Re: Documentation style for options with optional levels

2019-04-10 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 4/10/19 5:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: For options that can be used as -foo or -foo=level we have a variety of different styels for documenting what the default level is. See below for several examples. I find this a bit confusing when try to see what it means to use the option without a leve

GCC 8: adding, thru a plugin, an analyzing RTL pass after pro_and_epilogue issue with its reference_pass_name

2019-04-10 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello All, This is work done for the CHARIOT H2020 project (see https://www.chariotproject.eu/ for more context) in relation with my BISMON project (see http://github.com/bstarynk/bismon/ for more, and, if you want more context, read the draft report on http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/bismon-

Re: GCC 8: adding, thru a plugin, an analyzing RTL pass after pro_and_epilogue issue with its reference_pass_name

2019-04-10 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 17:53 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > Hello All, > > This is work done for the CHARIOT H2020 project (see > https://www.chariotproject.eu/ for more context) in relation with my > BISMON project (see http://github.com/bstarynk/bismon/ for more, and, > if > you want mor

Apache CouchDB users list

2019-04-10 Thread Lana
Hi, Would you be interested in Apache CouchDB users list for your business campaign? Also have users of MongoDB, Amazon DynamoDB, MariaDB, Apache Hadoop, Redis, Cassandra, Cloudant, RethinkDB etc. If you are interested let me know your targeted criteria, so that I will run the counts and pricing

Re: Documentation style for options with optional levels

2019-04-10 Thread Martin Sebor
On 4/10/19 9:46 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 4/10/19 5:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: For options that can be used as -foo or -foo=level we have a variety of different styels for documenting what the default level is. See below for several examples. I find this a bit confusing when try to see w