Hi,
I wrote my GSoC Proposal to the "Parallelize GCC with threads" project,
and if someone is interested in it, I am linking the text here in order
to get feedback. Please let me know if something is not entirely clear,
or if there are any problems with the calendar, or if you have any
suggestions
> On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:03 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
>
> hi folks,
>
> i was interesting in tackling some problems gcc netbsd/vax has.
> it has some ICEs which are in reload phase. searching around, the answer
> to that is "switch to LRA first". Now, I don't quite know what that is
> yet, but I
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 01:25:50PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 2019, at 5:03 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> >
> > hi folks,
> >
> > i was interesting in tackling some problems gcc netbsd/vax has.
> > it has some ICEs which are in reload phase. searching around, the answer
> > to th
Rainer Emrich writes:
> Test results here:
>
> 7.4.1 revision 270001
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-03/msg03790.html
>
> 8.3.1 revision 270001
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-03/msg03824.html
>
> 9.0.1 revision 270001
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-03/m
Snapshot gcc-9-20190331 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20190331/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
Nevermind, the Ada issue only affects the 32 bits build.
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> Rainer Emrich writes:
>
>> Test results here:
>>
>> 7.4.1 revision 270001
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-03/msg03790.html
>>
>> 8.3.1 revision 270001
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-0
On 3/29/19, nick wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-03-29 10:28 a.m., nick wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019-03-29 5:08 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, nick wrote:
>>>
On 2019-03-28 4:59 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:31 PM nick wrote:
>>
>> Greeti
Hi,
I would like to apply the ARC specific fix for bugzilla 89877 to
include/longlong.h file, but I don't know for sure if I am allowed or
not. I mention that I am the ARC reviewer.
Thanks,
Claudiu