On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, 02:23 Eric Gallager, wrote:
> On 3/8/19, David Brown wrote:
> > On 09/03/2019 00:06, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can gcc report when the parameter name in a C prototype
> >>> does not match that used in the implementation?
> >>
On 09/03/2019 03:23, Eric Gallager wrote:
On 3/8/19, David Brown wrote:
On 09/03/2019 00:06, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Can gcc report when the parameter name in a C prototype
does not match that used in the implementation?
int f(int x);
int f(int y) {.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 08:30:19AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, 02:23 Eric Gallager, wrote:
> > How would it handle the case where the parameter name is missing
> > entirely from the prototype? I see a lot of header files with their
> > prototypes written like that.
> >
> >
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019, 11:27 AM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 08:30:19AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, 02:23 Eric Gallager, wrote:
> > > How would it handle the case where the parameter name is missing
> > > entirely from the prototype? I see a lot of
办QO
理 $ +Q+V+信/-
--
& $ -- I 3 4
髮 $--- 2 4 3 4
& $ ---6 1 4 8
漂 $
-2019/3/10
(I am reading the GCC mailing list in digest mode)
On 3/9/19 10:58 PM, gcc-digest-h...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Can gcc report when the parameter name in a C prototype
does not match that used in the implementation?
int f(int x);
int f(int y) {...}
I t
