Status
==
The GCC 7 branch is open for regression and documentation fixes again.
The next release from the GCC 7 branch is due after GCC 9 was released
and will close the branch.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
---
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:41 PM wrote:
>
> Snapshot gcc-9-20181202 is now available on
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20181202/
> and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
GCC 9 on PowerPC is doing well. I was able to test on GCC110 and
GCC112 from the com
On 2018-12-05 2:38 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a testcase to reproduce duplicate clone symbols
> such as in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297 I
> started with a testcase that is known to have constprop clones and
> split it into two object files:
Hi,
I have a random C program as a test case, for which I need to do
source code coverage on gcc.
I have used the gcov tool and further the lcov tool. The percentage of
source code coverage which I get after using gcov, Is that the final %
which I need to do gcc source code coverage?
What does it
On 03.12.2018 21:25, Alexander Popov wrote:
> But I think it's better to register the 'stackleak_cleanup' pass just one pass
> earlier -- before the '*free_cfg' pass. I'll double check it for different
> versions of gcc on all supported architectures and return with a new patch.
I've tested this i
Currently the 'stackleak_cleanup' pass deleting a CALL insn is executed
after the 'reload' pass. That allows gcc to do some weird optimization in
function prologues and epilogues, which are generated later [1].
Let's avoid that by registering the 'stackleak_cleanup' pass before
the '*free_cfg' pas
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05 2018, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a testcase to reproduce duplicate clone symbols
> such as in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297 I
> started with a testcase that is known to have constprop clones and
> split it into two object files:
The GNU Compiler Collection version 7.4 has been released.
GCC 7.4 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 7 branch
containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in
GCC 7.3 with more than 189 bugs fixed since the previous release.
This release is available from the FTP servers listed at
UNSUBSCRIBE
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:13 AM Alexander Popov wrote:
>
> Currently the 'stackleak_cleanup' pass deleting a CALL insn is executed
> after the 'reload' pass. That allows gcc to do some weird optimization in
> function prologues and epilogues, which are generated later [1].
>
> Let's avoid that by r
Hello everyone!
We are working on writing a paper about testing the reliability of C compilers
by using Csmith (a random C99 program generator).
A previous testing effort, using Csmith, found 79 GCC bugs, and 25 of those
have been marked by developers as P1
(https://www.flux.utah.edu/download?
Snapshot gcc-7-20181206 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20181206/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
"Segher Boessenkool" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 02:19:14AM +0100, Stefan Kanthak wrote:
>> "Paul Koning" wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, that's a rather nasty cut & paste error I made.
>>
>> I suspected that.
>> Replacing
>> !(den & (1L<<31))
>> with
>> (signed short) den >= 0
>> avoids this
sameeran joshi writes:
> Hi,
> I have a random C program as a test case, for which I need to do
> source code coverage on gcc.
> I have used the gcov tool and further the lcov tool. The percentage of
> source code coverage which I get after using gcov, Is that the final %
> which I need to do gcc
Radu Ometita writes:
> Hello everyone!
>
> We are working on writing a paper about testing the reliability of C
> compilers by using Csmith (a random C99 program generator).
>
> A previous testing effort, using Csmith, found 79 GCC bugs, and 25 of
> those have been marked by developers as P1
> (
15 matches
Mail list logo
