Pay attention to this warning!!Your Domain needs ownership Policy update!

Re: Re: RFQ-SPRAYWAY –TPR CO., LTD

RFQ-SPRAYWAY –TPR CO., LTD.xlsx Description: Binary data

Should "can_create_pseudo_p" check "lra_in_progress"?

I just tracked down a "reload" bug and was very surprised to find that can_create_pseudo_p doesn't return false during register allocation when using LRA. It's still defined like this: #define can_create_pseudo_p() (!reload_in_progress && !reload_completed) Is it deliberate that it doesn't ch

blkmov and alignment

The documentation says that argument 4 of the blkmov insn gives the alignment, for example 4 if things are word-aligned. It's documented that, say, the value 4 means source and destination are multiples of 4. What isn't clear is whether the length is also a multiple of 4 in this case. In othe

MDaemon Notification -- Attachment Removed

--- MDaemon has detected restricted attachments within an email message --- >From : ad...@lachongcenter.org To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject : VSL: MV EURO GOLD

Re: blkmov and alignment

On October 5, 2018 4:17:53 PM GMT+02:00, Paul Koning wrote: >The documentation says that argument 4 of the blkmov insn gives the >alignment, for example 4 if things are word-aligned. > >It's documented that, say, the value 4 means source and destination are >multiples of 4. What isn't clear is w

Re: Should "can_create_pseudo_p" check "lra_in_progress"?

On 10/5/18 7:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > I just tracked down a "reload" bug and was very surprised to find that > can_create_pseudo_p doesn't return false during register allocation when > using LRA. > > It's still defined like this: > > #define can_create_pseudo_p() (!reload_in_progress && !re

Re: blkmov and alignment

> On Oct 5, 2018, at 12:21 PM, Richard Biener > wrote: > > On October 5, 2018 4:17:53 PM GMT+02:00, Paul Koning > wrote: >> The documentation says that argument 4 of the blkmov insn gives the >> alignment, for example 4 if things are word-aligned. >> >> It's documented that, say, the value

Re: Should "can_create_pseudo_p" check "lra_in_progress"?

On 10/05/2018 01:19 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/5/18 7:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote: I just tracked down a "reload" bug and was very surprised to find that can_create_pseudo_p doesn't return false during register allocation when using LRA. It's still defined like this: #define can_create_pseudo_p(

gcc-8-20181005 is now available

Snapshot gcc-8-20181005 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20181005/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-8