Please don't cross-post to both gcc@gcc.gnu.org and
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org, it is almost never appropriate to send the same
email to both lists, because they are for discussing different topics.
You're looking for help, so use gcc-help not gcc. Please remove
gcc@gcc.gnulorg from further replies in t
My builds from HEAD are failing unless I remove these tests. Are these
invalid tests?
diff --git a/gcc/opt-suggestions.c b/gcc/opt-suggestions.c
index 9444a35cb54..e64ee7e5660 100644
--- a/gcc/opt-suggestions.c
+++ b/gcc/opt-suggestions.c
@@ -264,8 +264,6 @@ test_completion_valid_options (optio
On 10/4/18 6:05 AM, Anthony Green wrote:
>
> My builds from HEAD are failing unless I remove these tests. Are these
> invalid tests?
>
> diff --git a/gcc/opt-suggestions.c b/gcc/opt-suggestions.c
> index 9444a35cb54..e64ee7e5660 100644
> --- a/gcc/opt-suggestions.c
> +++ b/gcc/opt-suggestions.c
Hi!
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:11:36 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
> appointed Thomas Schwinge as OpenACC Maintainer.
Thanks for your trust, after all these years. I'm happy to accept, and
will of course (continue to) work closely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am pleased to announce that the videos for the GNU Tools Cauldron
are now available on the wiki:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2018
For those who prefer their videos as a playlist, it is available here:
https://www.youtube.ca/playlist?
Jeff Law writes:
> They're Fortran specific options. I'm not sure how that impacts your
> tests though.
Thanks Jeff. I figured this out now. I was building a C compiler from
a source tree that does not include the sources for the fortran
front-end. It seems that this is no longer supported,
I was looking at PR tree-optimization/61247, where a loop with an unsigned
int index on an LP64 platform was not getting vectorized and I noticed an
odd thing. In the function below, if I define N as 1000 or 1, the
loop does get vectorized, even in LP64 mode. But if I define N as 10,
the
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:49 PM Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> I was looking at PR tree-optimization/61247, where a loop with an unsigned
> int index on an LP64 platform was not getting vectorized and I noticed an
> odd thing. In the function below, if I define N as 1000 or 1, the
> loop does get vec
Snapshot gcc-7-20181004 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20181004/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7
