GCC 1.40.

2018-09-14 Thread ?yvind Hagen via gcc
Hi to you in GCC Development department. Do you still have manual Version 1.40 so I can decode if that code in Linux 0.01 is correctly set up 100% and just that. And, I am wondering if that is easy to decode MS-DOS 5.0 to run in Linux 0.01? A long, long ago, I have been sent to you an e-mail som

Re: GCC 1.40.

2018-09-14 Thread Ian Lance Taylor via gcc
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:40 AM, ?yvind Hagen via gcc wrote: > > Hi to you in GCC Development department. > Do you still have manual Version 1.40 so I can decode if that code in Linux > 0.01 is correctly set up 100% and just that. > And, I am wondering if that is easy to decode MS-DOS 5.0 to run

Test results update for gcc 9.0.0 on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2018-09-14 Thread Rainer Emrich
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-09/msg01798.html Full build and testsuite logs here: https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/pootRHorSgdtBkG If it's of any help I may try to do a bootstrap and testsuite run every 2 or 3 weeks. Rainer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digita

Re: Test results update for gcc 9.0.0 on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2018-09-14 Thread Richard Biener
On September 14, 2018 3:50:52 PM GMT+02:00, Rainer Emrich wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-09/msg01798.html > >Full build and testsuite logs here: >https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/pootRHorSgdtBkG > >If it's of any help I may try to do a bootstrap and testsuite run

Re: Test results update for gcc 9.0.0 on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2018-09-14 Thread JonY
On 09/14/2018 01:50 PM, Rainer Emrich wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-09/msg01798.html > > Full build and testsuite logs here: > https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/pootRHorSgdtBkG > > If it's of any help I may try to do a bootstrap and testsuite run every > 2 or 3

Re: section attribute of compound literals

2018-09-14 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi Jim, On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:39 PM Jim Wilson wrote: > The > compound literal could have an address, but we don't have a way to > attach attributes to compound literals. Thanks for the confirmation of the problem. > Since your testcase already has a symbol in the right section, you could

Re: section attribute of compound literals

2018-09-14 Thread Jim Wilson
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:44 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Assuming this is an array of a huge amount of > chacha20poly1305_testvec, I'm not sure if there's a syntax for me to > define the symbol inline with the declarations. Any ideas? Don't do it inline. u8[] __stuffdata key_value = ... ... .

Re: section attribute of compound literals

2018-09-14 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi Jim, That becomes a bit harder when there are many many items: https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/crypto/zinc/selftest/chacha20poly1305.h#n87 Here I'd like to use compound literals to avoid wasting space, as several members are variably sized. Unfortunately I can't do that per https://g

gcc-8-20180914 is now available

2018-09-14 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-8-20180914 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20180914/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-8