Hi to you in GCC Development department.
Do you still have manual Version 1.40 so I can decode if that code in Linux
0.01 is correctly set up 100% and just that.
And, I am wondering if that is easy to decode MS-DOS 5.0 to run in Linux 0.01?
A long, long ago, I have been sent to you an e-mail som
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:40 AM, ?yvind Hagen via gcc wrote:
>
> Hi to you in GCC Development department.
> Do you still have manual Version 1.40 so I can decode if that code in Linux
> 0.01 is correctly set up 100% and just that.
> And, I am wondering if that is easy to decode MS-DOS 5.0 to run
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-09/msg01798.html
Full build and testsuite logs here:
https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/pootRHorSgdtBkG
If it's of any help I may try to do a bootstrap and testsuite run every
2 or 3 weeks.
Rainer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
On September 14, 2018 3:50:52 PM GMT+02:00, Rainer Emrich
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-09/msg01798.html
>
>Full build and testsuite logs here:
>https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/pootRHorSgdtBkG
>
>If it's of any help I may try to do a bootstrap and testsuite run
On 09/14/2018 01:50 PM, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-09/msg01798.html
>
> Full build and testsuite logs here:
> https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/pootRHorSgdtBkG
>
> If it's of any help I may try to do a bootstrap and testsuite run every
> 2 or 3
Hi Jim,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:39 PM Jim Wilson wrote:
> The
> compound literal could have an address, but we don't have a way to
> attach attributes to compound literals.
Thanks for the confirmation of the problem.
> Since your testcase already has a symbol in the right section, you could
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:44 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Assuming this is an array of a huge amount of
> chacha20poly1305_testvec, I'm not sure if there's a syntax for me to
> define the symbol inline with the declarations. Any ideas?
Don't do it inline.
u8[] __stuffdata key_value = ...
...
.
Hi Jim,
That becomes a bit harder when there are many many items:
https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/src/crypto/zinc/selftest/chacha20poly1305.h#n87
Here I'd like to use compound literals to avoid wasting space, as
several members are variably sized. Unfortunately I can't do that per
https://g
Snapshot gcc-8-20180914 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20180914/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-8