Hi all,
hsdis PrintLIRWithAssembly failed to work for mips64el after upgraded to
jdk8u181-b13.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-August/007753.html
The root cause is the patch [MIPS] Enable non-executable PT_GNU_STACK
support, contributed by Faraz in 2016 February, had no
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Leslie Zhai wrote:
> The root cause is the patch [MIPS] Enable non-executable PT_GNU_STACK support,
> contributed by Faraz in 2016 February, had not been merged by GCC toolchain
> upstream.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00444.html
Was there a non-RFC GCC
Hi Joseph,
Thanks for your response!
hsdis is just able to workaround when linking with -Wl,-z,noexecstack
flag, and my environment:
$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 3.10.84-19.fc21.loongson.2.mips64el #1 SMP
PREEMPT Fri Jul 6 18:47:47 CST 2018 mips64 mips64 mips64 GNU/Linux
$ gcc -v
On 08/03/2018 04:42 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>>> 3) Should I come up with a symbol versioning of the libgcov API?
>>
>> Certainly.
>
> Furthermore, make sure that the libgcov.a symbols remain hidden (via
> building the static objects with $(vis_hide),
( I don't know if it's allowed to ask such question, if not, please remind
me. )
I know Intel implemented several static branch prediction mechanisms these
years:
* 80486 age: Always-not-take
* Pentium4 age: Backwards Taken/Forwards Not-Taken
* PM, Core2: Didn't use static prediction, ra
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> I'm sending second version of the patch candidate. I was able to create
> a mapfile and generate versioned symbols for libgcov.so file.
>
> Unresolved issues:
> 1) I still see linking with static library:
>
> $ find /home/marxin/bin/gcc -name libgc
I'm trying to convert the pdp11 target to use LRA.
A lot of it "just works". But one of the test suite files fails in a way that
I can't figure out at all. I'm hoping for some help or hints to track down the
cause and come up with a fix.
The failing program is testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> 2) Do I understand that correctly that I need to build .o files twice:
> once with hidden visibility and second time without for the shared
> library?
Yes.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Dear GCC people,
At the moment, with GCC 8.2, I compile the program
```
int foo(const char *p)
{
if(p == 0)
return 2;
const char *q = p + 1;
if(q == 0)
return 1;
return 0;
}
```
using
```
gcc-8 test.c -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -O3 -S
```
and get the following as
On 08/14/2018 09:45 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
> Dear GCC people,
>
> At the moment, with GCC 8.2, I compile the program
>
> ```
> int foo(const char *p)
> {
> if(p == 0)
> return 2;
> const char *q = p + 1;
> if(q == 0)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> }
> ```
>
> using
>
> ``
On 08/14/2018 01:32 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> I'm trying to convert the pdp11 target to use LRA.
>
> A lot of it "just works". But one of the test suite files fails in a way
> that I can't figure out at all. I'm hoping for some help or hints to track
> down the cause and come up with a fix.
>
在 2018-08-15 12:48, Jeff Law 写道:
I just don't think anyone's ever bothered to catch this case. I believe
there is a BZ which touches on this issue.
Yes, here it is: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
This PR uses a placement new as the example, which in GCC 8 assumes the
poi
12 matches
Mail list logo
