When I modify the gcc source code, sometimes I do not know what parameters does
the function call.
For example,
bool warn_if_unused_value(const tree exp,location_t locus){ function
declaration ...
}
I want to know what "exp" and "locus" are by using fprintf such as
fprintf(stderr,"%s\n%s\n",e
I have ever seen "fprintf(dump_file,"something writes into dump_file") many
times.
I want to know what dump_file is and how can I check its content ?
> Subject: What is dump_file in gcc ?
>
> I have ever seen "fprintf(dump_file,"something writes into dump_file") many
> times.
> I want to know what dump_file is and how can I check its content ?
I'm not 100% sure, but my best guess is that this is related to GCC dumps, e.g.
related to passes.
Y
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 06 2018, 冠人 王 via gcc wrote:
> When I modify the gcc source code, sometimes I do not know what parameters
> does the function call.
> For example,
> bool warn_if_unused_value(const tree exp,location_t locus){ function
> declaration ...
> }
> I want to know what "exp" and "loc
On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 13:04 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 06 2018, 冠人 王 via gcc wrote:
> > When I modify the gcc source code, sometimes I do not know what
> > parameters does the function call.
> > For example,
> > bool warn_if_unused_value(const tree exp,location_t locus){
Dear GCC folks,
Some scientists in our organization still want to use the Intel
compiler, as they say, it produces faster code, which is then executed
on clusters. Some resources on the Web [1][2] confirm this. (I am aware,
that it’s heavily dependent on the actual program.)
My question is,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Paul Menzel <
pmenzel+gcc.gnu@molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
> Dear GCC folks,
>
>
> Some scientists in our organization still want to use the Intel compiler,
> as they say, it produces faster code, which is then executed on clusters.
> Some resources on the Web [1][2]
Dear Joel,
Thank you for your quick reply.
On 06/06/18 17:57, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Some scientists in our organization still want to use the Intel compiler,
as they say, it produces faster code, which is then executed on clusters.
Some re
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:51 PM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Dear GCC folks,
>
>
> Some scientists in our organization still want to use the Intel compiler, as
> they say, it produces faster code, which is then executed on clusters. Some
> resources on the Web [1][2] confirm this. (I am aware, that it’s h
Dear Paul,
The opinion you've mentioned is common in scientific community. However, in
more detail it often surfaces that the used set of GCC compiler options
simply does not correspond to that "fast" version of Intel. For instance,
when you do "-O3" for Intel it actually corresponds to (at least)
One case where ICC can generate much faster code sometimes is by using
the nontemporal pragma [https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/524559]
with loops.
AFAIK, there's no such equivalent pragma in gcc
[https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-01/msg00028.html].
When I tried this simple example
https://git
On 06/06/2018 10:22 AM, Dmitry Mikushin wrote:
> The opinion you've mentioned is common in scientific community. However, in
> more detail it often surfaces that the used set of GCC compiler options
> simply does not correspond to that "fast" version of Intel. For instance,
> when you do "-O3" for
Snapshot gcc-6-20180606 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20180606/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
13 matches
Mail list logo
