On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 8:05 PM Paul Koning wrote:
> One of my testsuite failures for the pdp11 back end is
gcc.c-torture/compile/930326-1.c which is:
> struct
> {
>char a, b, f[3];
> } s;
> long i = s.f-&s.b;
> It fails with "error: initializer element is not computable at load time".
> I
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 12:36 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
> On May 26, 2018 11:32:29 AM GMT+02:00, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <
li...@carewolf.com> wrote:
> >I brought this subject up earlier, and was told to suggest it again for
> >gcc 9,
> >so I have attached the preliminary changes.
> >
> >My studies
Hello,
I try to build a 64-bit RISC-V tool chain for RTEMS. RTEMS doesn't use
virtual memory. The reference chips for 64-bit RISC-V such as FU540-C000
locate the RAM at 0x8000_. This forces me to use -mcmodel=medany in
64-bit mode. The ctrbegin.o contains this code (via crtstuff.c):
exte
On Sat, 26 May 2018, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On May 25, 2018 6:57:13 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>On 05/25/2018 03:49 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >>> wrote:
> On 23 May 2018 at
On Montag, 28. Mai 2018 12:58:20 CEST Richard Biener wrote:
> compile-time effects of the patch on that. Embedded folks may want to rhn
> their favorite benchmark and report results as well.
>
> So I did a -O2 -march=haswell [-ftree-slp-vectorize] SPEC CPU 2006 compile
> and run and the compile-ti
On Mai 28 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
> It means there's no relocation that can express the result of 's.f - &s.b'
> and the frontend doesn't consider this a constant expression (likely because
> of the conversion).
Shouldn't the frontend notice that s.f - &s.b by itself is a constant?
Andreas.
On May 28, 2018 12:45:04 PM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>On Mai 28 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> It means there's no relocation that can express the result of 's.f -
>&s.b'
>> and the frontend doesn't consider this a constant expression (likely
>because
>> of the conversion).
>
>Shouldn't
> On May 28, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2018 12:45:04 PM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Mai 28 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>> It means there's no relocation that can express the result of 's.f -
>> &s.b'
>>> and the frontend doesn't consider this
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Here are some people you may know and would like to connect with you. Reach out
and build new connections.
Andrea Jung
Chairperson and CEO of Avon Group of companies.
View Profile Co
Ok, thanks for the clarification jakub.
Umesg
On Mon, May 7, 2018, 2:08 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 01:58:48PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> > CCed Jakub,
>
> > > Agree that float division don't touch memory ,but fdiv result (stack
> > > register ) is stored back to a me
10 matches
Mail list logo
