Resend for easy reading. Thanks!
On 2018-01-16 14:45, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:35 PM, chenzhelu wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I encountered a problem on "local class name conflict",
>> I searched on net and found that years ago, some people also encoutered this
>> kind of prob
On 2018-01-16 14:45, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:35 PM, chenzhelu wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I encountered a problem on "local class name conflict",
>> I searched on net and found that years ago, some people also encoutered this
>> kind of problem.
>
> The correct name for this
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:21:07AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> We're still in pretty bad shape regression-wise. Please also take
> the opportunity to check the state of your favorite host/target
> combination to make sure building and testing works appropriately.
I tested building Linux (the k
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:21:07AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > We're still in pretty bad shape regression-wise. Please also take
> > the opportunity to check the state of your favorite host/target
> > combination to make sure building and test
On 01/15/2018 03:11 PM, Shahid Khan wrote:
Our team at Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. is interested in
contributing patches to the upstream GCC compiler project. To get the process
started, we'd like to request a copyright assignment form as per contribution
guidelines outlined at http
Boot strap on Darwin x86_64 with llvm now seems broken as of last 8.0.0
snapshot, it still is working fine with 7.2.0.
I've added bug: 83903
x86_64, armv6, armv7, aarch64 all seem fine on linux. I've been building
with latest gmp (6.1.2), mpfr (4.0.0) and mpc (1.1.) across all my systems.
I o
Thanks for the info, Jim.
Siddhesh,
Is there a separate copyright assignment for glibc or the same form works for
both?
-Shahid
-Original Message-
From: Jim Wilson [mailto:j...@sifive.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 1:01 PM
To: Shahid Khan ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: siddh...@linaro.
Hi Shahid,
You need a separate assignment for every GNU project you intend to
contribute to, so separate assignments for GCC, glibc, binutils, etc.
Siddhesh
On 17-Jan-2018 01:25, "Shahid Khan" wrote:
Thanks for the info, Jim.
Siddhesh,
Is there a separate copyright assignment for glibc or th
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
wrote:
> You need a separate assignment for every GNU project you intend to
> contribute to, so separate assignments for GCC, glibc, binutils, etc.
The form is the same for all GNU projects.
You can file an assignment that covers a single patc
On 17-Jan-2018 02:02, "Jim Wilson" wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
wrote:
> You need a separate assignment for every GNU project you intend to
> contribute to, so separate assignments for GCC, glibc, binutils, etc.
The form is the same for all GNU projects.
Right,
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Jim Wilson wrote:
> You should contact ass...@gnu.org directly. The standard forms contain
> language about patents that Qualcomm lawyers are unlikely to be comfortable
> with, and may require negotiating a non-standard agreement. As best as I can
> tell, the FSF has never re
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Jim Wilson wrote:
> You can file an assignment that covers a single patch, or a single
> project, or multiple patches, or multiple projects, or even all
> patches for all projects. Though of course the lawyers will have a
> say in this, as they may not be comfortable with a b
12 matches
Mail list logo
