On 14/12/17 12:39, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> Looking at some of the red blobs in e.g. the grid view there seem to be
> a few failures in the initial "update gcc trunk repo" step of the form:
>
> svn: Working copy '.' locked
> svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for
>
On 14/12/17 21:32, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Great, I thought the CF machines were reserved for developpers.
> Good news you could add builders on them.
>
Oh. I have seen similar things happening on CF machines so I thought it
was not a problem. I have never specifically asked for permission.
>
On 15 December 2017 at 10:19, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
>
> On 14/12/17 21:32, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Great, I thought the CF machines were reserved for developpers.
>> Good news you could add builders on them.
>>
>
> Oh. I have seen similar things happening on CF machines so I thought it
> was not
On 15/12/17 08:42, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> I don't think this is good news at all.
>
As I pointed out in a reply to Chris, I haven't seeked permission but I
am pretty sure something similar runs in the CF machines from other
projects.
The downside is that if we can't use the CF, I hav
On 15/12/17 10:21, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> And the patch was committed last night (r255659), so maybe your builds now
> work?
>
Forgot to mention that. Yes, it built!
https://gcc-buildbot.linki.tools/#/builders/5
--
Paulo Matos
On 2017.12.15 at 10:21 +0100, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
>
> On 15/12/17 08:42, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> >
> > I don't think this is good news at all.
> >
>
> As I pointed out in a reply to Chris, I haven't seeked permission but I
> am pretty sure something similar runs in the CF machines from
On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 10:16 +0100, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> On 14/12/17 12:39, David Malcolm wrote:
[...]
> > It looks like you're capturing the textual output from "jv compare"
> > and
> > using the exit code. Would you prefer to import "jv" as a python
> > module and use some kind of API? Or a
On 12/14/17 9:18 PM, Leslie Zhai wrote:
> * The papers by Briggs and Chaiten contradict[2] themselves when examine
> the text of the paper vs. the pseudocode provided?
I've read both of these papers many times (in the past) and I don't recall
any contradictions in them. Can you (Dave?) be more sp
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:16:15PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> There's a policy question we'll need to figure out for after the
> conversion of whether we want to have a branch namespace where people can
> push branches that can be deleted and rebased (while branches outside that
> namespace ca
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 08:42:18AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2017.12.14 at 21:32 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On 14 December 2017 at 09:56, Paulo Matos wrote:
> > > I got an email suggesting I add some aarch64 workers so I did:
> > > 4 workers from CF (gcc113, gcc114, gcc115 and
10 matches
Mail list logo
