I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Jim Wilson as RISC-V co-maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Jim on his additional role.
Jim, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
Hi,
I would like to backport patch r250097 to gcc7.x branch. It does changes
libgcc/config.host and gcc/config.gcc for ARC. Do I need to get extra approvals
for it or I just fallow the wiki on this page
(https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnMerge).
Thanks,
Claudiu
Hi,
I'm trying to make a gcc backend for a stack machine, is there a way to
disable register specific behaviour required by target.h, target.c? also
all preserved names in the RTL language assume usages of operands (addm3
mulm3 etc) which is not an option in my target, do I have to manually set
up
On 11/15/2017 08:33 AM, Ábrahám Endre wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to make a gcc backend for a stack machine, is there a way to
> disable register specific behaviour required by target.h, target.c? also
> all preserved names in the RTL language assume usages of operands (addm3
> mulm3 etc) which is no
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 09:53:12 PST (-0800), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 09:47:37 PST (-0800), Jim Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
+riscv port Jim Wilson
It is jimw not jim for the email address. Please fix.
Sorry.
So I set up fake registers in target.h, and implement their behaviour with
a stack logic?
My binutils is already ported, how will this work with GAS not knowing
whether i use registers or not?
2017-11-15 16:38 GMT+01:00 Jeff Law :
> On 11/15/2017 08:33 AM, Ábrahám Endre wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm try
I've found this in the docs, reg-stack.c comments seems like this is what
I'm looking for, RTL needs registers some way and the output is just a
distance from the top of the stack. Hope this will know push/pop implicitly
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Stack-Registers.html#Stack-Registers
2
On Nov 14, 2017, at 3:21 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Mike Stump wrote:
>> The testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr34971.c seems wrong to me. The
>> type of the expression x.b << 8 has size 8, a size 8 integral type is a
>> 64-bit type. If the result is a 64-bit type, then i
Snapshot gcc-6-20171115 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20171115/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
