RFC: Update top level libtool files

Hi Guys, I would like to update the top level libtool files (libtool.m4, ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and lt~obsolete.m4) used by gcc, gdb and binutils. Currently we have version 2.2.7a installed in the source trees and I would like to switch to the latest official version: 2.

Re: RFC: Update top level libtool files

On 2017.10.10 at 12:45 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I would like to update the top level libtool files (libtool.m4, > ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and lt~obsolete.m4) used by > gcc, gdb and binutils. Currently we have version 2.2.7a installed in > the source trees a

Re: RFC: Update top level libtool files

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I would like to update the top level libtool files (libtool.m4, > ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and lt~obsolete.m4) used by > gcc, gdb and binutils. Currently we have version 2.2.7a installed in > the source trees and I wou

Re: RFC: Update top level libtool files

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I would like to update the top level libtool files (libtool.m4, > ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and lt~obsolete.m4) used by > gcc, gdb and binutils. Currently we have version 2.2.7a installed in > the source tree

GCC 5 branch is now closed

After the GCC 5.5 release the GCC 5 branch is now closed. Please refrain from committing to it from now on. Thanks Jakub

GCC 5.5 Released

The GNU Compiler Collection version 5.5 has been released. GCC 5.5 is a bug-fix release from the GCC 5 branch containing important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in GCC 5.4 with more than 250 bugs fixed since the previous release. This is also the last release from the GCC 5 branch, GCC c

Re: RFC: Update top level libtool files

Hi Joseph, > As per previous discussions on the issue: it's necessary to revert libtool > commit 3334f7ed5851ef1e96b052f2984c4acdbf39e20c, see > . OK - thanks for that pointer. > I do not know > if there are other local libtool changes

Re: RFC: Update top level libtool files

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Nick Clifton wrote: > > I do not know > > if there are other local libtool changes that are not in version 2.4.6; it > > would be necessary to check all differences from 2.2.7a to determine > > whether any need to be re-applied to 2.4.6. > > *sigh* It seems that 2.2.7a wa

GCC Buildbot Update - Definition of regression

Hi all, It's almost 3 weeks since I last posted on GCC Buildbot. Here's an update: * 3 x86_64 workers from CF are now installed; * There's one scheduler for trunk doing fresh builds for every Daily bump; * One scheduler doing incremental builds for each active branch; * An IRC bot which is curren

Re: GCC Buildbot Update - Definition of regression

On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Paulo Matos wrote: > ANY -> no test ; Test disappears No, that's not a regression. Simply adding a line to a testcase will change the line number that appears in the PASS / FAIL line for an individual assertion therein. Or the names will change when e.g. -std=c++2a

Re: GCC Buildbot Update - Definition of regression

On 2017.10.10 at 21:45 +0200, Paulo Matos wrote: > Hi all, > > It's almost 3 weeks since I last posted on GCC Buildbot. Here's an update: > > * 3 x86_64 workers from CF are now installed; > * There's one scheduler for trunk doing fresh builds for every Daily bump; > * One scheduler doing incremen

Re: GCC Buildbot Update - Definition of regression

On 11/10/17 06:17, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2017.10.10 at 21:45 +0200, Paulo Matos wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It's almost 3 weeks since I last posted on GCC Buildbot. Here's an update: >> >> * 3 x86_64 workers from CF are now installed; >> * There's one scheduler for trunk doing fresh builds

Re: GCC Buildbot Update - Definition of regression

On 10/10/17 23:25, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Paulo Matos wrote: > >> new test -> FAIL; New test starts as fail > > No, that's not a regression, but you might want to treat it as one (in the > sense that it's a regression at the higher level of "testsuite run should

Re: GCC Buildbot Update - Definition of regression

On 2017.10.11 at 08:22 +0200, Paulo Matos wrote: > > > On 11/10/17 06:17, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On 2017.10.10 at 21:45 +0200, Paulo Matos wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> It's almost 3 weeks since I last posted on GCC Buildbot. Here's an update: > >> > >> * 3 x86_64 workers from CF are now