Re: Slides from GNU Tools Cauldron

2017-10-05 Thread Pedro Alves
On 10/04/2017 08:09 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hello, > all but one videos from this year Cauldron has been edited and are now linked > from https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2017 (plugins BoF will appear till end > of week). > > I would also like to update the page with links to slides. If someone

Re: Slides from GNU Tools Cauldron

2017-10-05 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 10/05/2017 07:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: I like the table with direct links to talks/slides/videos on last year's page, so I spent a while this morning adding a table to this year's page. Hope others find that useful too. yay! thanks. now to go find my slides ... nathan -- Nathan Sidwell

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread R0b0t1
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 10/03/2017 03:27 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Sandra Loosemore >> mailto:san...@codesourcery.com>> wrote: > > > [snip] > > FAOD, R0b0t1 forwarded mail I deliberately sent off-list back to the list. > I do know

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread R0b0t1
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:33 AM, David Brown wrote: > > R0b0t1, you might not realise this but CodeSoucery is a major > contributor to gcc and other gnu tools. Individuals and companies pay > them for their services - to put together tested, qualified and > documented bundles of development tools,

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread R0b0t1
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 3 October 2017 at 22:27, R0b0t1 wrote: >> I decline to do your company's market research for them. They could choose >> to pay me, of course. Based on the failures I am experiencing I doubt that >> your company has gotten the build proces

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread David Brown
On 05/10/17 22:16, R0b0t1 wrote: On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:33 AM, David Brown wrote: R0b0t1, you might not realise this but CodeSoucery is a major contributor to gcc and other gnu tools. Individuals and companies pay them for their services - to put together tested, qualified and documented

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread R0b0t1
I apologize for the series of emails, but having stitched many responses together before, the series is easier. This is a response to the conversation started by noloader. I appreciate the empathy he had for my question, as that is what led me to ask it (I have also had the exact same issues tryin

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread carl hansen
toolchain problems? If you really want to learn , try linuxfromscratch.org and http://trac.clfs.org/ Cross linux from scratch You complained about too much documentation, and here's some more.

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 10/05/2017 02:16 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: I find it hard to care about someone's position or affiliation but instead choose to care about what they do and how they act. If it was Sandra's intent to ask me for free work, then I am not sure how that qualifies as "the right thing." Per my latest respon

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 5 October 2017 at 22:11, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 10/05/2017 02:16 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > >> I find it hard to care about someone's position or affiliation but >> instead choose to care about what they do and how they act. If it was >> Sandra's intent to ask me for free work, then I am not sure

gcc-7-20171005 is now available

2017-10-05 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-7-20171005 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20171005/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7

Re: Exhaustive Instructions for Toolchain Generation

2017-10-05 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 10/05/2017 03:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Maybe it's best if this thread is allowed to die. Yes, thank you. :-) -Sandra