On 03/10/17 23:27, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Sandra Loosemore
> wrote:
>> On 09/26/2017 03:05 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>> Is there anything else I should be aware of?
>>
>>
>> Yes, there are companies (like, ahem, the one I work for --
>> CodeSourcery/Mentor/Siemens) who provide c
On 3 October 2017 at 22:27, R0b0t1 wrote:
> I decline to do your company's market research for them. They could choose
> to pay me, of course. Based on the failures I am experiencing I doubt that
> your company has gotten the build process entirely correct.
Given that you apparently only recently
On 10/04/2017 06:34 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 3 October 2017 at 22:27, R0b0t1 wrote:
I decline to do your company's market research for them. They could choose
to pay me, of course. Based on the failures I am experiencing I doubt that
your company has gotten the build process entirely correc
Hi!
Ping.
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:37:50 +0200, I wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:18:39 -0600, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > On 09/21/2017 11:56 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:38:29 -0600, Carlos O'Donell
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 09/21/2017 10:50 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
On 10/02/2017 12:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 10/02/2017 12:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:45:24AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
What's more, in strict mode GCC transforms stpcpy calls to strcpy.
Only if the result is not needed or if the length of the source string
is a
There are over 25000 words of GCC installation documentation in
install.texi, and that's not even including e.g. libstdc++ configure
options documented elsewhere. Other toolchain components also have such
documentation.
It's true that, as a consequence of the toolchain being made up of
multip
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> There are over 25000 words of GCC installation documentation in
> install.texi, and that's not even including e.g. libstdc++ configure
> options documented elsewhere. Other toolchain components also have such
> documentation.
>
> It's true th
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Of the thousands of hits when searching for the information on a task
> like compiling GCC, there's probably a handful of good sources.
> Everything else is just crap on the web that someone decided to blog
> about. (This is speaking from experience).
T
On 4 October 2017 at 17:14, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Maybe some of the first steps is to (1) recognize the information
> management problem, and (2) provide information dissemination that's
> {amicable|consistent|?} with what's occurring in 2017. I mean,
What does that mean in concrete terms?
> RE
On 4 October 2017 at 17:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 4 October 2017 at 17:14, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> Maybe some of the first steps is to (1) recognize the information
>> management problem, and (2) provide information dissemination that's
>> {amicable|consistent|?} with what's occurring in 201
>>> For completeness, GCC has a wiki. But I still don't have an account to
>>> make an occasional update; and I still don't know how to get an
>>> account. I tried to get one in the past but the process was broken so
>>> I gave up.
>>
>> 1) create an account
>> 2) get your username added to the rig
On 4 October 2017 at 17:45, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
For completeness, GCC has a wiki. But I still don't have an account to
make an occasional update; and I still don't know how to get an
account. I tried to get one in the past but the process was broken so
I gave up.
>>>
>>> 1) cr
On 10/03/2017 10:45 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 10/03/2017 05:36 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 01:27:05PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Is there an idiom for target-specific back end code to ask the pass
manager
if a particular pass (e.g., "split1") has already run?
On 04/10/17 00:22, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 10/03/2017 03:27 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Sandra Loosemore
mailto:san...@codesourcery.com>> wrote:
[snip]
FAOD, R0b0t1 forwarded mail I deliberately sent off-list back to the list. I
do know that business solicitations a
On 10/04/2017 02:10 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Incidentally, I don't understand why there is no "Professional Support"
page where we can direct people to find professional support. It could
My recollection is that the FSF explicitly prohibit this.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
Hello,
all but one videos from this year Cauldron has been edited and are now linked
from https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2017 (plugins BoF will appear till end
of week).
I would also like to update the page with links to slides. If someone beats me
on this and adds some or all of them as attach
On 4 Oct 2017 8:01 pm, "Nathan Sidwell" wrote:
On 10/04/2017 02:10 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Incidentally, I don't understand why there is no "Professional Support"
> page where we can direct people to find professional support. It could
>
My recollection is that the FSF explicitly prohibi
Snapshot gcc-6-20171004 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20171004/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
18 matches
Mail list logo
