GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread Paulo Matos
Hi all, I am internally running buildbot for a few projects, including one for a simple gcc setup for a private port. After some discussions with David Edelsohn at the last couple of Cauldrons, who told me this might be interesting for the community in general, I have contacted Sergio DJ with a fe

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/20/2017 09:01 AM, Paulo Matos wrote: > Hi all, > > I am internally running buildbot for a few projects, including one for a > simple gcc setup for a private port. After some discussions with David > Edelsohn at the last couple of Cauldrons, who told me this might be > interesting for the com

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread David Edelsohn
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/20/2017 09:01 AM, Paulo Matos wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am internally running buildbot for a few projects, including one for a >> simple gcc setup for a private port. After some discussions with David >> Edelsohn at the last couple of Cauld

Re: Infering that the condition of a for loop is initially true?

2017-09-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2017-09-14 22:36:34 +0200, Geza Herman wrote: > Do you plan adding something like __builtin_assume to GCC? It is useful, > because of this idiom to help the compiler to optimize better: > > #ifdef MY_DEBUG > #define MY_ASSERT(assertion) do { if (!(assertion)) ... } while (0) > #else > #define M

Re: Infering that the condition of a for loop is initially true?

2017-09-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2017-09-18 19:20:33 +0200, Niels Möller wrote: > Joseph Myers writes: > > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Niels Möller wrote: > > >> I'm suggesting that with -DNDEBUG, assert(x) should let the compiler > >> assume that x is true, but without producing any code to evaluate it at > >> runtime. > > > > T

Re: [RFC] type promotion pass

2017-09-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/19/2017 05:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> We might also need some way of having gimple statements that can >>> convert (or promote to the type without extensions) just to keep the >>> gimple type system happy. >> >> Yes, one of the "issu

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Paulo Matos wrote: > - buildbot can notify people if the build fails or if there's a test > regression. Notification can be sent to IRC and email for example. What > would people prefer to have as the settings for notifications? It's very useful if someone reviews regressions

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread R0b0t1
Hello friends! On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:12 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/20/2017 09:01 AM, Paulo Matos wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am internally running buildbot for a few projects, including one for a >>> simple gcc setup for a private

gcc-6-20170920 is now available

2017-09-20 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-6-20170920 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20170920/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:01:55PM +0200, Paulo Matos wrote: > This mail's intention is to gauge the interest of having a buildbot for > GCC. +1. Or no, +100. > - which machines we can use as workers: we certainly need more worker > (previously known as slave) machines to test GCC in differ

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > - buildbot can notify people if the build fails or if there's a test > > regression. Notification can be sent to IRC and email for example. What > > would people prefer to have as the settings for notifications? > > Just try it! IRC is most usef

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2017.09.20 at 18:01 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:01:55PM +0200, Paulo Matos wrote: > > This mail's intention is to gauge the interest of having a buildbot for > > GCC. > > +1. Or no, +100. > > > - which machines we can use as workers: we certainly nee

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-20 Thread Paulo Matos
On 20/09/17 17:07, Jeff Law wrote: > I'd strongly recommend using one of the existing infrastructures. I > know several folks (myself included) are using Jenkins/Hudson. There's > little to be gained building a completely new infrastructure to manage a > buildbot. > As David pointed out in an

Fwd: Possible gcc 4.8.5 bug about RELOC_HIDE marcro in latest kernel code

2017-09-20 Thread Jia He
转发的消息 主题: Possible gcc 4.8.5 bug about RELOC_HIDE marcro 日期: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:31:55 +0800 发件人:Jia He 收件人:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org I tried to build kernel 4.14-rc1 on a arm64 server in distro centos 7.3. The gcc v

Re: Possible gcc 4.8.5 bug about RELOC_HIDE marcro in latest kernel code

2017-09-20 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Jia He wrote: > > > > 转发的消息 > 主题: Possible gcc 4.8.5 bug about RELOC_HIDE marcro > 日期: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:31:55 +0800 > 发件人:Jia He > 收件人:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > > > > I tried to build