Fwd: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119

2017-09-10 Thread R0b0t1
Hello list, has anyone experienced problems on the AIX POWER8 system? -- Forwarded message -- From: R0b0t1 Date: Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119 To: David Edelsohn Do you care to explain? I'm not trying to tell you h

Fwd: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119

2017-09-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Yes, the disks are very slow. You just have to live with it. Obviously migrating gcc119 to Linux would be silly when we have other Linux machines. The whole point of this one is to have an AIX host for testing in AIX. On Sunday, 10 September 2017, R0b0t1 wrote: > > Hello list, has anyone exper

Re: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119

2017-09-10 Thread R0b0t1
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Yes, the disks are very slow. You just have to live with it. > The commands I was having problems with are rm and tar (to decompress an xz archive, and to delete a failed compilation environment setup). The software project in question is

Re: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119

2017-09-10 Thread David Edelsohn
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:08 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: >> Yes, the disks are very slow. You just have to live with it. >> > > The commands I was having problems with are rm and tar (to decompress > an xz archive, and to delete a failed compilat

Bounce GCC119 (was: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119)

2017-09-10 Thread Jeffrey Walton
Hi David, > The system was configured to maximize diskspace and flexibility. It > now is supporting six, separate VMs. The disk array was configured as > a single physical volume, mapped to a single logical volume, that then > is partitioned into virtual I/O devices mapped to the VMs, which then

Re: Bounce GCC119 (was: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119)

2017-09-10 Thread David Edelsohn
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Hi David, > >> The system was configured to maximize diskspace and flexibility. It >> now is supporting six, separate VMs. The disk array was configured as >> a single physical volume, mapped to a single logical volume, that then >> is pa

gcc-8-20170910 is now available

2017-09-10 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-8-20170910 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20170910/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision

Re: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119

2017-09-10 Thread R0b0t1
Thank you for the reply! On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 2:49 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:08 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jonathan Wakely >> wrote: >>> Yes, the disks are very slow. You just have to live with it. >>> >> >> The commands I was having pr

Re: Bounce GCC119 (was: [cfarm-admins] Extremely Slow Disk Access On GCC119)

2017-09-10 Thread R0b0t1
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 4:21 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> Hi David, >> >>> The system was configured to maximize diskspace and flexibility. It >>> now is supporting six, separate VMs. The disk array was configured as >>> a single physica