On August 11, 2017 6:23:01 PM GMT+02:00, R0b0t1 wrote:
>I have checked a few of the mirrors listed on
>https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html. That page lists a few keys that
>releases might be signed by, but on all of the mirrors I checked I do
>not actually see any signed files. What am I missing?
On
Joseph Myers writes:
> I suppose a question for the present proposal would be making sure any
> dependencies generated in this case do not include dependencies on files
> that don't exist (so #include "some-misspelling.h" doesn't create any sort
> of dependency on such a header).
Good point.
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> Patches should go to gcc-patches.
Ok, will keep in mind for future (seeing that we have a discussion
already it probably doesn't make sense to move this patch).
> Two spaces after a full stop (all three times).
Fixed, new revision included.
Thanks,
Boris
Index:
Hi Boris,
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 05:53:44PM +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool writes:
>
> > Patches should go to gcc-patches.
>
> Ok, will keep in mind for future (seeing that we have a discussion
> already it probably doesn't make sense to move this patch).
Please do move it
Environment:
gcc 6.1
compiling for 64bit i386
optimizations: -O2
Consider this simple bit of code (from
https://stackoverflow.com/a/45656087/2189500):
#include
int getStringLength(const char *pStr){
int len;
__asm__ (
"repne scasb\n\t"
"not %%ecx\n\t"
"dec
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:21 PM, David Wohlferd
> wrote:
>> Environment:
>> gcc 6.1
>> compiling for 64bit i386
>> optimizations: -O2
>>
>> Consider this simple bit of code (from
>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/45656087/2189500):
>>
>> #inc
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:21 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
> Environment:
> gcc 6.1
> compiling for 64bit i386
> optimizations: -O2
>
> Consider this simple bit of code (from
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/45656087/2189500):
>
> #include
>
> int getStringLength(const char *pStr){
>
> int len;
>
>
