A release candidate for GCC 7.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/gcc-7.2-RC-20170802/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 250819.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Please test it and repo
/opt/gcc-6.3/bin/gcc -fplugin=./dragonegg.so test/hello.c -wrapper
gdb,--args
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.12.1-48.fc25
...
Reading symbols from
/opt/gcc-6.3/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/6.3.0/cc1...done.
(gdb) b /data/project/xiangzhai/gcc-6.3.0/gcc/passes.c:2288
Breakpoint 1 at 0x91b8d4: fil
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:56:58PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/02/2017 12:34 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > I'm not sure if that's a good or a bad thing. Currently the mid-end
> > depends on some rtx constructs having sensible costs even if there's no
> > rtl pattern to match them (II
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> Long ago, there was a code size regression tester for at least
> ARM. Is that still around?
There used to be autotesters from CSiBE. Something still appears to
exist (http://www.csibe.org/old/) but the last time I tried to run the
benchmar
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 17:21 +0800, Leslie Zhai wrote:
> /opt/gcc-6.3/bin/gcc -fplugin=./dragonegg.so test/hello.c -wrapper
> gdb,--args
> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.12.1-48.fc25
> ...
> Reading symbols from
> /opt/gcc-6.3/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/6.3.0/cc1...done.
> (gdb) b /data/project/x
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 17:59 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Torvald Riegel writes:
> > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 14:09 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> (1) Does the approach seem reasonable?
> >>
> >> (2) Would it be acceptable in principle to add this extension to the
> >> GCC C fron
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 17:32 +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 17:59 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Torvald Riegel writes:
> > > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 14:09 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > >> (1) Does the approach seem reasonable?
> > >>
> > >> (2) Would it be accep
On August 3, 2017 5:32:40 PM GMT+02:00, Torvald Riegel
wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 17:59 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Torvald Riegel writes:
>> > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 14:09 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >> (1) Does the approach seem reasonable?
>> >>
>> >> (2) Would it be acce
On 08/02/2017 01:34 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 26/07/17 18:54, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 07/17/2017 02:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 07/17/2017 12:20 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> Now what should it take as input? An rtx_insn,
On August 3, 2017 5:51:35 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Biener
wrote:
>On August 3, 2017 5:32:40 PM GMT+02:00, Torvald Riegel
> wrote:
>>On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 17:59 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Torvald Riegel writes:
>>> > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 14:09 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> >> (1) D
On 08/02/2017 11:34 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> I'm working on a patch to modify the testsuite to obey the
> --load-average value if one is passed to make. It seems to work pretty
> well, except for libstdc++ which doesn't load gcc/libs/gcc-defs.exp
> since it defines it's own ${tool}_functions. I
Torvald Riegel writes:
> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 17:59 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Torvald Riegel writes:
>> > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 14:09 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >> (1) Does the approach seem reasonable?
>> >>
>> >> (2) Would it be acceptable in principle to add this extensi
On August 3, 2017 7:05:05 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>Torvald Riegel writes:
>> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 17:59 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Torvald Riegel writes:
>>> > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 14:09 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> >> (1) Does the approach seem reasonable?
>>
On Aug 2, 2017, at 10:34 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
>
> I'm working on a patch to modify the testsuite to obey the
> --load-average value if one is passed to make.
The code seems like a reasonable approach. Love to see numbers and test
scenarios so that others can tell if you've covered their us
Hi David,
Thanks for your kind response!
在 2017年08月03日 21:54, David Malcolm 写道:
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 17:21 +0800, Leslie Zhai wrote:
/opt/gcc-6.3/bin/gcc -fplugin=./dragonegg.so test/hello.c -wrapper
gdb,--args
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 7.12.1-48.fc25
...
Reading symbols from
/opt/gcc-6.3/libexec
15 matches
Mail list logo