Lack of capability to represent arbitrary alias dependent information

2017-06-12 Thread Bin.Cheng
HI, GCC adds runtime alias checks for data references in passes like vectorizer, it would be very useful to pass along the runtime alias dependent information to later passes. Given below expample: int foo (int *a, int *b, int *c, int *d, int *e, int len, int v) { int k, x; for (k = 0; k < le

Re: Lack of capability to represent arbitrary alias dependent information

2017-06-12 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > HI, > GCC adds runtime alias checks for data references in passes like > vectorizer, it would be very useful to pass along the runtime alias > dependent information to later passes. Given below expample: > > int foo (int *a, int *b, int *c, int

Re: Lack of capability to represent arbitrary alias dependent information

2017-06-12 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> HI, >> GCC adds runtime alias checks for data references in passes like >> vectorizer, it would be very useful to pass along the runtime alias >> dependent information to later passes.

Re: Lack of capability to represent arbitrary alias dependent information

2017-06-12 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: >>> HI, >>> GCC adds runtime alias checks for data references in passes like >>> vectorizer, it would be very useful to pass along

Re: Lack of capability to represent arbitrary alias dependent information

2017-06-12 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: HI, GCC adds runtime alias checks for data references in passes l

GCC 6.3 vs 6.3.1 - whats the difference? Is 6.3.1 an unofficial secret GCC release?

2017-06-12 Thread info rmer
A lot of Linux distributions have gcc 6.3.1 available, or even preinstalled. However, I am not able to find any info about 6.3.1 at the official GCC pages at gnu org. Please tell, is 6.3.1 an unofficial secret GCC release? What is the difference between 6.3 and 6.3.1, any changelog?

Re: GCC 6.3 vs 6.3.1 - whats the difference? Is 6.3.1 an unofficial secret GCC release?

2017-06-12 Thread Richard Biener
On June 12, 2017 8:37:37 PM GMT+02:00, info rmer wrote: >A lot of Linux distributions have gcc 6.3.1 available, or even >preinstalled. >However, I am not able to find any info about 6.3.1 at the official GCC >pages at gnu org. >Please tell, is 6.3.1 an unofficial secret GCC release? >What is the

Re: GCC 6.3 vs 6.3.1 - whats the difference? Is 6.3.1 an unofficial secret GCC release?

2017-06-12 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 12 June 2017 at 19:37, info rmer wrote: > A lot of Linux distributions have gcc 6.3.1 available, or even preinstalled. > However, I am not able to find any info about 6.3.1 at the official GCC pages > at gnu org. See https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#num_scheme

Re: GCC 6.3 vs 6.3.1 - whats the difference? Is 6.3.1 an unofficial secret GCC release?

2017-06-12 Thread info rmer
12.06.2017, 21:41, "Richard Biener" : > > 6.3.1 is the version GCC reports for snapshots off the GCC 6 branch between > the 6.3 and the upcoming 6.4 release. It's basically 6.3 with additional > patches. > > Richard. > Thank you very much. Is there any way to obtain the source code for this 6.3.

Re: GCC 6.3 vs 6.3.1 - whats the difference? Is 6.3.1 an unofficial secret GCC release?

2017-06-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:01:41AM +0300, info rmer wrote: > 12.06.2017, 21:41, "Richard Biener" : > > > > 6.3.1 is the version GCC reports for snapshots off the GCC 6 branch > > between the 6.3 and the upcoming 6.4 release. It's basically 6.3 with > > additional patches. > > > > Richard. > > > >