Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Matias Fonzo wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:18:49 -0600 > Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 06/07/2017 02:25 PM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: >> > Dear GCC steering committee, >> > >> > This has been recently asked in this list[1], but in case you have >> > missed it because of

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Antonio Diaz Diaz
Richard Biener wrote: While openSUSE has it, SLES does not. tar support seems to be via calling the external lzip tool (failing if that is not available). You mean SUSE Linux Enterprise Server is using a format that does not guarantee safe interoperability among implementations[1] to "power

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Antonio Diaz Diaz
Jeff Law wrote: We've got far more important items to tackle than this. But if you want me to bring it up formally with the SC I can. ps. And just to be clear, I actually don't like xz and I'm always annoyed when I run into something delivered in xz format. But xz support at the distro level

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:27:30AM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > Gzip was once ubiquituous in distro packages and it was replaced. But this > time distros won't lead the change because they can work around the main > defects of xz. As you can read in section 2.2 of > http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > Richard Biener wrote: >> >> While openSUSE has it, SLES does not. tar support seems to be >> via calling the external lzip tool (failing if that is not available). > > > You mean SUSE Linux Enterprise Server is using a format that does n

Re: Getting spurious FAILS in testsuite?

2017-06-08 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
On 05.06.2017 18:25, Jim Wilson wrote: On 06/01/2017 05:59 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: Hi, when I am running the gcc testsuite in $builddir/gcc then $ make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS='ubsan.exp' comes up with spurious fails. This was discussed before, and the suspicion was that it was a linux kern

Re: Getting spurious FAILS in testsuite?

2017-06-08 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 8 June 2017 at 11:57, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > On 05.06.2017 18:25, Jim Wilson wrote: >> >> On 06/01/2017 05:59 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >>> >>> Hi, when I am running the gcc testsuite in $builddir/gcc then >>> $ make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS='ubsan.exp' >>> comes up with spurious fails. >> >

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > For integrity checking, gcc provides the md5.sum, sha512.sum files on > gcc.gnu.org and gpg signatures on ftp.gnu.org. The choice of xz is that > it is used very widely these days, which is not the case of lzip. And given http://lists.gnu.org/

Re: Doxygen for GCC

2017-06-08 Thread Martin Liška
On 04/28/2017 02:32 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > I'm planning to periodically build it and rsync to a public website. > I guess, sometimes it can be handy. Done that (it's weekly updated): http://gcc.opensuse.org/gcc-doxygen/ Martin

Tmjj

2017-06-08 Thread Luke Girard
🏄🏾‍♀️🎇⌨️💽🗜🖨🌃 StXXLx Sent 📸🌃from my iPhone

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Matias Fonzo
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:42:48 +0200 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:27:30AM +0200, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > > Gzip was once ubiquituous in distro packages and it was replaced. > > But this time distros won't lead the change because they can work > > around the main defects of xz

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Antonio Diaz Diaz
Jakub Jelinek wrote: http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/xz_inadequate.html#fragmented You keep referencing the marketing pages of one of the formats comparing to other formats, that can be hardly considered unbiased. Most of the compression formats have similar kind of pages, usually biased as well.

Re: Steering committee, please, consider using lzip instead of xz

2017-06-08 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/08/2017 03:27 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > Jeff Law wrote: >> We've got far more important items to tackle than this. But if you >> want me to bring it up formally with the SC I can. >> >> ps. And just to be clear, I actually don't like xz and I'm always >> annoyed when I run into somethi

Re: Getting spurious FAILS in testsuite?

2017-06-08 Thread Jeff Law
On 06/08/2017 04:24 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On 8 June 2017 at 11:57, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> On 05.06.2017 18:25, Jim Wilson wrote: >>> >>> On 06/01/2017 05:59 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: Hi, when I am running the gcc testsuite in $builddir/gcc then $ make check-gcc RUNTESTF

Re: Getting spurious FAILS in testsuite?

2017-06-08 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 06/08/2017 04:24 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> On 8 June 2017 at 11:57, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >>> On 05.06.2017 18:25, Jim Wilson wrote: On 06/01/2017 05:59 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > Hi, when I am running the gcc tests

gcc-7-20170608 is now available

2017-06-08 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-7-20170608 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20170608/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7

Re: Doxygen for GCC

2017-06-08 Thread Eric Gallager
On 6/8/17, Martin Liška wrote: > On 04/28/2017 02:32 PM, Martin Liška wrote: >> I'm planning to periodically build it and rsync to a public website. >> I guess, sometimes it can be handy. > > Done that (it's weekly updated): > > http://gcc.opensuse.org/gcc-doxygen/ > > Martin > Clicking on the fi