On 06/03/17 21:15, Roland Illig wrote:
Hi,
I am currently translating GCC into German. During that, I noticed that
in some places the term "zero character" means '\0'. The official term
though is "null character", as per the C standard.
Since it is confusing to have two different terms for the
On 03/10/2017 03:08 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
As discussed at the last Cauldron, the first interest of the community
seems to be the shared infrastructure of Sourceware: hosting, sys
Hi all,
Some (many?) targets have instructions that perform an arithmetic operation and
set the condition flags based on the result.
For example, on aarch64, we have instructions like ADDS, SUBS, ANDS etc.
In the machine description we represent them as a PARALLEL pattern of a COMPARE
and the a
> My understanding was that the order of the two in this pattern here doesn't
> matter because there is an implicit PARALLEL around them, but I found that
> the compare-elimination pass (compare-elim.c) assumes that the COMPARE set
> must be in the second position for it to do the transformations i
On 10/03/17 10:23, Eric Botcazou wrote:
My understanding was that the order of the two in this pattern here doesn't
matter because there is an implicit PARALLEL around them, but I found that
the compare-elimination pass (compare-elim.c) assumes that the COMPARE set
must be in the second positio
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:10:34AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some (many?) targets have instructions that perform an arithmetic operation
> and set the condition flags based on the result.
> For example, on aarch64, we have instructions like ADDS, SUBS, ANDS etc.
> In the machine
On 10 March 2017 at 06:39, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to get some clean test results on Cygwin and have
> encountered a number of problems. I've opened a report for the one I'm most
> concerned with (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79867). When an
> executable
On 10/03/17 10:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:10:34AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Some (many?) targets have instructions that perform an arithmetic operation and
set the condition flags based on the result.
For example, on aarch64, we have instructions like ADDS,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Daniel Santos wrote:
> 3. Wouldn't it be better to move this logic up into DejaGnu and restrict gcc
> to using a black-box interface for modifying the environment?
GCC is meant to work with a wide range of different DejaGnu versions.
There would be a long gap between adding
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 07/03/17 20:38, Roland Illig wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in the diagnostics the %qs specifier is used in most of the cases. But
> > there are some cases left where the more complicated %<%s%> is used. Is
> > there a good reason to prefer the complic
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:30:33AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> I'm trying to improve the cases where the result of the arithmetic
> operation is used in multiple places besides the comparison.
> For example:
> add w0, w0, w1
> add w1, w0, 2
> cmp w0, 0
>
> Co
Howdy,
Would you like to be our Global 2-day AI Big Data Cloud IoT Boot Camp partner
in your area?
If you can find 30 or plus attendees, provide venue, food, drinks and all other
necessary logistics, then we're happy to split the total revenue evenly with
you by sending our top-niche industry p
Ce
Sent from my iPhonezE
On 02/24/2017 11:55 AM, NightStrike wrote:
Currently, to build natively on cygwin, this patch is required to zlib:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MSYS2-packages/blob/master/zlib/1.2.11-cygwin-no-widechar.patch
Thank you for this. Unfortunately, I didn't see this message prior to
filing my bug re
14 matches
Mail list logo
