Hi Steve,
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I was looking at the spec 456.hmmer benchmark and this email string
> from Jeff Law and Micheal Matz:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01970.html
>
> and was wondering if anyone was looking at what more it would take
> for G
Hi,
in the diagnostics the %qs specifier is used in most of the cases. But
there are some cases left where the more complicated %<%s%> is used. Is
there a good reason to prefer the complicated spelling?
Same for %<%T%> and %qT, and similar letters.
Regards,
Roland
Snapshot gcc-5-20170307 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20170307/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
