Hi,
I'm looking into the possibility of adding a SPIR-V
(https://www.khronos.org/registry/spir-v) backend to GCC or as a
plug-in. The output of which would be binary from the compiler, not
binutils, with an option to extract a textual representation using an -f
flag. The positive of this would be
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, wrote:
>
> I'm looking into the possibility of adding a SPIR-V
> (https://www.khronos.org/registry/spir-v) backend to GCC or as a
> plug-in. The output of which would be binary from the compiler, not
> binutils, with an option to extract a textual representation us
On March 6, 2017 6:29:49 PM GMT+01:00, Ian Lance Taylor via gcc
wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking into the possibility of adding a SPIR-V
>> (https://www.khronos.org/registry/spir-v) backend to GCC or as a
>> plug-in. The output of which would be binary from the c
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> >I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
> >
> >Generating SPIR-V output would not cause that output to become GPLv3
> >licensed. However, linking the result against the GCC support
> >libraries, as is normally required for any program generated
On March 6, 2017 6:55:10 PM GMT+01:00, Alexander Monakov
wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
>> >
>> >Generating SPIR-V output would not cause that output to become GPLv3
>> >licensed. However, linking the result against the GCC s
Hi,
I am currently translating GCC into German. During that, I noticed that
in some places the term "zero character" means '\0'. The official term
though is "null character", as per the C standard.
Since it is confusing to have two different terms for the same concept,
the term "zero character" s
I was looking at the spec 456.hmmer benchmark and this email string
from Jeff Law and Micheal Matz:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01970.html
and was wondering if anyone was looking at what more it would take
for GCC to vectorize the loop in P7Viterbi. There is a big performanc
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, gccad...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> gcc-7-20170305.tar.bz2 Complete GCC
>
> SHA256=ea44ed9c765acacf3ae03a33ea386e70af98f51e97f4506c5bc7b54ded56d19e
> SHA1=b9fcd2b9d68753f32234c7e21fef94ef0c91d419
Please note that I changed from MD5 and SHA1 hashes for snapshots
t
On Mär 07 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> (If you have been using a command m5sum or similar to verify the
> checksum so far, now you can use "openssl sha256", for example.)
There is also sha256sum, which has a more regular output.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key finge
