Eric Botcazou writes:
> > I'll run testing for at least x86_64, MIPS and another
> > WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS target and try to get this committed in the
> > next couple of days so it can get into everyone's testing well before
> release.
>
> No issues found on SPARC.
Thanks Eric.
I'm still boo
On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 13:06 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 01:08 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > Unless HW transactions are guaranteed to succeed for scenarios that are
> > sufficient for the atomics, HTM won't help because we'd have to consider
> > the worst-case, which would mean s
On 23/01/17 18:18, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hello again,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:19:04AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
I am flexible in terms of the ABI choice for the 64-bit PowerPC. I guess
the ABI_ELFv2 is the way to go?
It certainly is the most modern ABI. It makes some requirements t
Hi,
I am trying to determine what is the status of the powerpc-apple-darwin target
for GCC. The last released version of GCC for which a successful build is
reported is 4.9.1
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-07/msg02093.html), and the last
gcc-testresults post I could find was in A
Hi,
I did a successful 6.1 build when it was first released a few months ago on
Darwin 9 (PowerPC 7457 (G4)). It took some time to build because cross did not
work properly and I had no time to really investigate it. I compiled several
tools and also some larger libraries (e.g. GMP) with no er
What's the matter with paradoxical subregs of memory? So, as far
as I understand, Recog refuses to match them unless they are
explicitly expressed as a pattern. On the other hand, Combine
does not know that they are "outlawed" and happily generates
them.
This happens sometimes with some new patt
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:11:49PM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> I still get a lot of ICEs with the attached two patches (examples):
> /home/EB/sebastian_h/archive/gcc-git/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function
> '__multc3':
> /home/EB/sebastian_h/archive/gcc-git/libgcc/libgcc2.c:2035:1: error:
> unrec
Hi,
Here's a report of a successful build and install of GCC:
$ gcc-6.3.0/config.guess
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
$ newcompiler/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=newcompiler/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/aaro/gcctest/newcompiler/libexec/gcc/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/6.3.0/lto-wrapp
The attached patch introduces an installation script and support structure to
build OpenCoarrays using mpich, allowing multi-image gfortran, (latest Fortran
standards).
This patch is preliminary and intended to allow testing and comments to start.
I would like to get this into gcc 7 release as a
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:36:13PM +0100, FX wrote:
> I am trying to determine what is the status of the powerpc-apple-darwin
> target for GCC. The last released version of GCC for which a successful build
> is reported is 4.9.1
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-07/msg02093.html), a
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 06:36:04PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> What's the matter with paradoxical subregs of memory? So, as far
> as I understand, Recog refuses to match them unless they are
> explicitly expressed as a pattern.
If INSN_SCHEDULING is defined recog does not allow paradoxical subre
11 matches
Mail list logo
