On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Serge Belyshev
wrote:
>> My builds for the last couple of days have all been failing in stage 2
>> like so:
>>
>> /home/arth/src/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c: In function ‘rtx_def*
>> ix86_expand_bui
>> ltin(tree, rtx, rtx, machine_mode, int)’:
>> /home/arth/src/gcc
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
>>> Constructing variable-length vectors
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently both tree and rtl vector const
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently revisited an ancient patch from Paolo
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00551.html) which uses
> asserts as optimization hints. I've rewritten the patch to be more
> stable under expressions with side-ef
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've recently revisited an ancient patch from Paolo
>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00551.html) which uses
>> asserts as optimization hints. I've rewrit
On 11/23/2016 01:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Serge Belyshev
wrote:
My builds for the last couple of days have all been failing in stage 2
like so:
/home/arth/src/gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c: In function ‘rtx_def* ix86_expand_bui
ltin(tree, rtx, rtx, machine_mod
On November 23, 2016 8:17:34 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 11/23/2016 01:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Serge Belyshev
>> wrote:
My builds for the last couple of days have all been failing in
>stage 2
like so:
/home/arth/src/gcc/gcc/config
On 11/23/2016 12:48 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On November 23, 2016 8:17:34 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/23/2016 01:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Serge Belyshev
wrote:
My builds for the last couple of days have all been failing in
stage 2
like so:
/ho
