Re: Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing

2016-10-19 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:38:50 +0200, I wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:08:44 +0200, Richard Biener >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Thomas Schwinge >> > wrote: >> > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:22:17 +0200, Richard Bie

[PR tree-optimization/78024] Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing

2016-10-19 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:07:13 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Thomas Schwinge > wrote: > > can I at > > least commit the OpenACC loops processing fix? Here is the latest > > version, simplified after your r241296 IRA vs. BB_VISITED fixes: > > Sure, I conside

Re: [PR lto/77458] Avoid ICE in offloading with differing _FloatN, _FloatNx types

2016-10-19 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:59:16 +0200, I wrote: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:18:00 +0200, Thomas Schwinge > wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:25:01 +0200, Richard Biener > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Thomas Schwinge > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:18:35 +0200, Ric

[BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]

2016-10-19 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! I noticed that building for --target=s390-linux-gnu (via config_list.mk) also hits the new fall-through checking code, see build http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=643406: [...] g++ -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-

Re: [BUILDROBOT] s390.md:10630:9: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]

2016-10-19 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/19/2016 10:26 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: Hi! I noticed that building for --target=s390-linux-gnu (via config_list.mk) also hits the new fall-through checking code, see build http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=643406: [...] g++ -fno-PIE -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -

[BUILDROBOT] ICE in altivec_init_builtins, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17547

2016-10-19 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! Building current GCC with current GCC (using config_list.mk) for --target=rs6000-ibm-aix5.3.0, I noticed a gcc_unreachable() during -fself-test, see build http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=643401 : [...] /scratch/4/jbglaw/configlist/build/rs6000-ibm-aix5.3.0/build

Re: [BUILDROBOT] ICE in altivec_init_builtins, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17547

2016-10-19 Thread David Edelsohn
Hi, JBG Yes, this is a known problem with Kelvin's recent patch. - David On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Hi! > > Building current GCC with current GCC (using config_list.mk) for > --target=rs6000-ibm-aix5.3.0, I noticed a gcc_unreachable() during > -fself-test, >

glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC

2016-10-19 Thread Ellcey, Steve
I have built the latest glibc sources with a ToT GCC and am trying to run the glibc testsuite now. I ran into a couple of new warnings that I fixed (locally) and am now looking at nptl/tst-thread_local1.cc which dies with: tst-thread_local1.cc:172:7: error: ‘thread’ is not a member of ‘std’

Re: glibc test tst-thread_local1.cc fails to compile with latest GCC

2016-10-19 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Ellcey, Steve wrote: > I have built the latest glibc sources with a ToT GCC and am trying to run the > glibc testsuite now. I ran into a couple of > new warnings that I fixed (locally) and am now looking at > nptl/tst-thread_local1.cc which dies with: > > tst-t