On 22/08/16 21:16 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 08/22/2016 03:40 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
What's going on?!
Have I fundamentally misunderstood something about how RUNTESTFLAGS or
effective-target keywords work?
Here's a wild guess.
In gdb's testsuite, I've seen odd problems like these bei
On 23/08/16 09:07 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/08/16 21:16 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 08/22/2016 03:40 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
What's going on?!
Have I fundamentally misunderstood something about how RUNTESTFLAGS or
effective-target keywords work?
Here's a wild guess.
In gdb's
On 08/23/2016 10:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> That's being set by prettyprinters.exp and xmethods.exp (so it's GDB's
>> fault! ;-)
:-)
> This seems to work. I'll do some more testing and commit later today.
LGTM.
Though IME, save/restoring globals in a constant source of trouble,
for occa
Is there a reason there's no changes.html for GCC 7 at this point? I'd
presumed that when adding new features one should also write release notes
for them (so, I should be writing release notes for _FloatN / _FloatNx),
but the file hasn't yet been created and there are lots of other new
featur
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Is there a reason there's no changes.html for GCC 7 at this point?
None, apart from me missing it and http://gcc.gnu.org/releasing.html
as well.
Segher beat me to it now (I was planning to do it tonight); let me
know whether there is anything else I ca
Snapshot gcc-5-20160823 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20160823/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
