Hi David,
Thanks a lot for a good question - I completely forgot to discuss that.
Current workloads in the CK are just to test our collaborative
optimization prototype.
They are even a bit outdated (benchmarks and codelets from the MILEPOST
project).
However, our point is to make an open sys
On 05/03/16 05:52, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/04/2016 09:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 04/03/16 16:21, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/04/2016 08:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
does that mean that the shift amount should be DImode?
Seems like a more flexible approach would be for the midend to be able
to h
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 21:13, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> I'll be willing to mentor this. Though I'd rather have us starting from
>> scratch and look at having a C-like input language, even piggy-backing on
>> the C frontend maybe.
>
> That's
A recent patch has broken bootstrapping (s390x) in stage3. The
failure creeped into trunk between friday and today:
-- snip --
g++ -std=gnu++98 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attri
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A recent patch has broken bootstrapping (s390x) in stage3. The
> failure creeped into trunk between friday and today:
>
> -- snip --
> g++ -std=gnu++98 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -W
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > A recent patch has broken bootstrapping (s390x) in stage3. The
> > failure creeped into trunk between friday and today:
> >
> > -- snip --
> > g++ -std=gnu++98 -g -O2 -DIN_G
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>> > A recent patch has broken bootstrapping (s390x) in stage3. The
>> > failure creeped into trunk between friday and toda
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:18:34PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:00:03PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Dominik Vogt
> >> wrote:
> >> > A recent patch has broken bootstrapping (
On 03/07/2016 02:12 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> A recent patch has broken bootstrapping (s390x) in stage3. The
> failure creeped into trunk between friday and today:
>
> -- snip --
> g++ -std=gnu++98 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narro
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 13:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal <
> prasad.ghan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6 March 2016 at 21:13, Richard Biener <
> > richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll be willing to mentor this. Though I'd rather have u
Kyrill Tkachov writes:
> On 05/03/16 05:52, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 03/04/2016 09:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/03/16 16:21, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/04/2016 08:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> does that mean that the shift amount should be DImode?
>> Seems like a more flexible
On 03/07/2016 03:44 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
The RTL documentation for ASHIFT and friends says that the shift amount
must be:
"a fixed-point mode or be a constant with mode @code{VOIDmode}; which
mode is determined by the mode called for in the machine description
entry for the left-shift ins
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:33:55AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 13:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal <
> > prasad.ghan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 6 March 2016 at 21:13, Richard Biener <
> > > richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrot
13 matches
Mail list logo
