On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:51:24AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> So I'm trying to create a define_insn to match something like:
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> (ashift:SI
> (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
> (and:QI
> (match_operand:QI 2
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:27:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > We were thinking on making a function attribute that ensures that non
> > necessary registers, or stack frames used by the function will be correctly
> > cleared before returning.
> > We think in implementing for x86_64 as a firs
On 04/03/16 11:59, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:51:24AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
So I'm trying to create a define_insn to match something like:
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(ashift:SI
(match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "r")
On 04/03/16 14:41, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 04/03/16 11:59, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:51:24AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
So I'm trying to create a define_insn to match something like:
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(ashift:SI
(ma
On March 4, 2016 3:48:21 PM GMT+01:00, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
>On 04/03/16 14:41, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>> On 04/03/16 11:59, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:51:24AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
So I'm trying to create a define_insn to match something like:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:48:21PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Although there are case where we hit the same problem:
> unsigned long
> f3 (unsigned long bit_addr)
> {
> unsigned long bitnumb = bit_addr & 63;
> return (1L << bitnumb);
> }
>
> combine will try to match:
> (set (reg:DI 78)
>
On 04/03/16 15:07, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:48:21PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Although there are case where we hit the same problem:
unsigned long
f3 (unsigned long bit_addr)
{
unsigned long bitnumb = bit_addr & 63;
return (1L << bitnumb);
}
combine will tr
On 04/03/16 15:12, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 04/03/16 15:07, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:48:21PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Although there are case where we hit the same problem:
unsigned long
f3 (unsigned long bit_addr)
{
unsigned long bitnumb = bit_addr & 63;
On 03/04/2016 08:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
does that mean that the shift amount should be DImode?
Seems like a more flexible approach would be for the midend to be able
to handle these things...
Or macroize for all integer modes?
That's probably worth exploring. I wouldn't be at all surpris
On 04/03/16 16:21, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/04/2016 08:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
does that mean that the shift amount should be DImode?
Seems like a more flexible approach would be for the midend to be able
to handle these things...
Or macroize for all integer modes?
That's probably worth ex
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 17:56 +0530, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> Thanks Prathamesh and Joseph for your suggestions.
>
> Here is my updated patch :
>
> for test cases:
>
> const int array[5] = {1, 2, 3};
> const int array1[3] = {1, 2, 3, 6};
> const int array2[4] = {1, 2, 3, 6, 89};
> c
On 4 March 2016 at 19:36, David Malcolm wrote:
> Those caret locations look wrong to me - they don't seem to be
> underlining the pertinent source. Is that what the patched compiler is
> printing, or did things get messed up somewhere via email?
Probably Gmail sucks at sending plain text. It suc
Tobias, Maxim, or anyone else,
For the projects accepted in 2015, if you send me the relevant info
(project title, student name, mentor name, a link to some webpage,
blog, wiki or a mailing list post describing the project), I will take
care of updating our wiki. This helps potential applicants to
On 5 March 2016 at 01:28, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Tobias, Maxim, or anyone else,
>
> For the projects accepted in 2015, if you send me the relevant info
> (project title, student name, mentor name, a link to some webpage,
> blog, wiki or a mailing list post describing the project), I will tak
Hi!
I am interested to work on Gimple FE project for gsoc16. I would like
to know the scope of the project for gsoc. Also anyone like to mentor
me for the project?
Thanks and Regards,
Prasad Ghangal
On 4 March 2016 at 20:10, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> There were 2 projects:
Thanks! I updated the wiki.
Cheers,
Manuel.
On 03/04/2016 09:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 04/03/16 16:21, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/04/2016 08:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
does that mean that the shift amount should be DImode?
Seems like a more flexible approach would be for the midend to be able
to handle these things...
Or macroize f
17 matches
Mail list logo
