On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Marcos Diaz
wrote:
> Hi, we are facing the same issue. This bugzilla was opened:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976
>
> We were thinking on making a function attribute that ensures that non
> necessary registers, or stack frames used by the func
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 11:49 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 13:14 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Torvald Riegel
>> >> w
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > Also this insistence that all of "trivially copyable" is already quite
> > nicely specified in the C++ ABI is still not really relevant because
> > C++ _is not the only language out there_. I'm not sure how often I
> > have to repeat this unti
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> > What about the example I gave above? Is it unrealistic for compilers
> > do ever do something like this, or is it just unlikely to gain much
> > performance, or is it just that GCC does not do this today?
>
> GCC does not do this today with th
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:55:07PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > > What about the example I gave above? Is it unrealistic for compilers
> > > do ever do something like this, or is it just unlikely to gain much
> > > performance, or is it j
Snapshot gcc-5-20160301 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20160301/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On 03/01/2016 11:43 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
Also this insistence that all of "trivially copyable" is already quite
nicely specified in the C++ ABI is still not really relevant because
C++ _is not the only language out there_. I'm not sure how ofte
> Given a combination of "I have new responsibilities" and "nothing has
> happened with mep for a long time" I would like to step down as mep
> maintainer.
>
> If someone would like to pick up maintainership of this target, please
> contact me and/or the steering committee. Otherwise, I propose
